Aminoglutethimide suppresses adrenocorticotropin receptor expression in the NCI-h295 adrenocortical tumor cell line

M Fassnacht, F Beuschlein1, S Vay, P Mora1, B Allolio and M Reincke1

Schwerpunkt Endokrinologie, Department of Medicine, University of Würzburg, Germany and 1Schwerpunkt Endokrinologie, Department of Medicine II, University of Freiburg, Germany

(Requests for offprints should be addressed to M Reincke, Schwerpunkt Endokrinologie, Abteilung Innere Medizin II Klinikum der Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106 Freiburg, Germany)

Abstract

The adrenostatic compound aminoglutethimide (AG), a potent inhibitor of the P450 side chain cleavage enzyme, is used in the treatment of ACTH-dependent or adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. Recently, AG has been shown to inhibit ACTH receptor (ACTH-R) mRNA expression in ovine adrenocortical cells in a time-dependent fashion. To investigate whether ACTH-R down-regulation will also be induced in tumor cells, we studied the effect of AG on ACTH-R expression in the human NCI-h295 adreno- cortical carcinoma cell line, which expresses functional ACTH receptors and produces steroids of the glucocorti- coid, mineralocorticoid and androgen pathway. The cells were incubated in triplicate with increasing doses of AG (3, 30, 300 µM) which suppressed steroid secretion dose- dependently. After 48 h, cells were harvested, and total RNA was extracted, electrophoresed, blotted and hybrid- ized with a human ACTH-R cDNA probe. In parallel experiments, after preincubation with AG the cells were stimulated with ACTH (10 nM) for 10 min and the intracellular cAMP accumulation was determined by RIA. AG significantly suppressed the baseline ACTH-R mRNA expression in a dose-dependent fashion (300 µM AG, 5 ± 1%; 30 µM AG, 64 ± 1%; 3 µM AG, 108 ± 19% compared with control cells, 100 ± 11%). The reduced

ACTH-R mRNA expression was paralleled by low ACTH-induced cAMP accumulation indicating reduced expression of the ACTH-R protein. The adrenostatic compound metyrapone, an inhibitor of 11ß-hydroxylase activity, also suppressed ACTH-R mRNA expression in a similar fashion. Stimulation of the protein kinase A path- way by simultaneous incubation of ACTH (10 nM) or forskolin (10 µM) together with AG was not able to overcome the steroid biosynthesis blockade, but reversed the inhibitory effects of AG on the ACTH-R mRNA expression. Also, cortisol (12 µM) reversed the AG- induced ACTH-R mRNA expression. We conclude that AG induces profound ACTH-R down-regulation in the NCI-h295 cell line either by affecting the gene expression or by decreasing transcript accumulation via an effect on RNA stability. This novel action of AG can be reversed by stimulation of the cAMP pathway and of the glucocorticoid-mediated signal transduction cascade. As the down-regulation occurs in vitro at concentrations which are reached during treatment with AG in humans it may contribute to its therapeutic activity in adrenal disease.

Journal of Endocrinology (1998) 159, 35-42

Introduction

Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) is the major hormone that regulates glucocorticoid secretion, adrenal androgen secre- tion and, together with angiotensin II, mineralocorticoid secretion of the adrenal cortex. ACTH acts through its specific receptor, the ACTH receptor (ACTH-R), a member of a superfamily of the seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors (Mountjoy et al. 1992) which is expressed in all three zones of the adrenal cortex. Activation of the ACTH-R leads to stimulation of the cAMP protein kinase A pathway, but the activation of other signal transduction cascades by ACTH such as the

protein kinase C (Arola et al. 1994, Armelin et al. 1996, Parissenti et al. 1996) and the lipo-oxygenase pathway (Yamazaki et al. 1996) have also been described. The ACTH-R belongs to the melanocortin receptor family which consists of four melanocyte-secreting hormone (MSH) receptors (MC-R 1, 3 to 5) and the ACTH (or MC-R 2) receptor (Magenis et al. 1994). The ACTH-R is mainly expressed in the adrenal cortex, but has recently been identified in human skin (Slominski et al. 1996) and rodent adipocytes (Boston & Cone 1996).

The role of ACTH-R mutations and ACTH-R expres- sion in adrenocortical tumorigenesis is still ill-defined. Constitutively activating point mutations, such as those

found in the thyrotropin (TSH) receptor gene in toxic thyroid adenomas, have not been identified in adreno- cortical tumors (Latronico et al. 1995, Light et al. 1995). Studies investigating ACTH-R expression by Northern blot or in situ hybridization found up-regulated ACTH-R mRNA levels in functional adrenocortical adenomas, but low ACTH-R mRNA expression in non-functional adenomas (Reincke et al. 1997, 1998). In these exper- iments, ACTH-R mRNA expression correlated well with the expression of P450 side chain cleavage (P450 scc) enzyme expression suggesting regulation by similar, as yet unidentified factors. In vitro, stimulation of the protein kinase A pathway induced up-regulation of both ACTH-R mRNA (Mountjoy et al. 1994) and P450 enzymes (Staels et al. 1993) in the human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line NCI-h295.

The adrenostatic compound aminoglutethimide (AG) is used in the treatment of patients with ACTH-dependent or adrenal Cushing’s syndrome. AG acts mainly by inhi- bition of P450 scc (Vanden Bossche 1992). In 1987, Darbeida and colleagues reported inhibition of the ACTH-induced cAMP production in ovine fasciculata- reticularis cells by AG (Darbeida & Durand 1987, Darbeida et al. 1987). This suggested that adrenostatic treatment with AG may modulate the ACTH-R expres- sion in the adrenal cortex. This hypothesis was recently confirmed by the same group showing that the abundance of ACTH-R mRNA in ovine adrenocortical cells was decreased by 1000 µM AG (Picard-Hagen et al. 1997). The effect of AG in this system was prevented by concomitant treatment with dexamethasone, demon- strating that AG presumably acts via suppression of glucocorticoid synthesis.

Modulation of ACTH-R expression may be desirable in patients with adrenocortical carcinomas in whom en- dogenous ACTH secretion may influence tumor growth via the ACTH-R G-protein protein kinase-A signaling cascade. Therefore, we investigated the effects of AG on the ACTH-R mRNA expression and the ACTH- induced intracellular cAMP accumulation in the NCI- h295 cell line which may serve as a cellular model for functional adrenocortical carcinomas.

Materials and Methods

Materials

AG, forskolin, cortisol, insulin, metyrapone, selenium, and transferrin were obtained from Sigma (Deisenhofen, Germany). RPMI 1640, fetal calf serum (FCS) and trypan blue stain were supplied by Life Technologies (Eggenstein, Germany). Synthetic ACTH1-24 was purchased from Ciba-Geigy (Wehr, Germany). [a-32P]dCTP was from Amersham Buchler (Braunschweig, Germany). Quickhyb and NucTrap purification columns were obtained from Stratagene (Heidelberg, Germany) and Qiabrane Nylon membrane from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany).

AG was dissolved in 65% ethanol as a stock solution. The final ethanol concentration in the experiments was <0.1%. Metyrapone was solubilized in 10 mM acetic acid (final concentration <20 µM).

Cell culture

The NCI-h295 tumor cell line (Gazdar et al. 1990), provided by A F Gazdar (National Cancer Institute, NIH, USA), was maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supple- mented with transferrin (0.1 mg/ml), insulin (5 µg/ml), selenium (5-2 µg/ml) and 2% FCS (=TIS medium). Cells were grown as suspension cells in 175 cm2 flasks at 37 ℃ under an atmosphere of 5% CO2-95% air. For the experiments, the cells were grown in 75 cm2 flasks (approx. 1-0 million cells/ml). The cells were incubated for 48 h with AG (3, 30, 300 µM), metyrapone (300 µM), ACTH (10 nM), forskolin (10 µM), AG (300 µM) plus ACTH (10 nM), AG (300 µM) plus forskolin (10 µM), AG (300 µM) plus cortisol (12 µM) or metyrapone (300 µM) plus forskolin (10 µM). Each experiment was performed in triplicate. At the end of the incubation period the medium was removed by centrifugation and stored at - 20 ℃ for subsequent hormone determination. Cells were examined by trypan blue staining for cell viability, counted with a coulter counter (CASY 1, Schärfe, Reutlingen, Germany), washed with PBS and prepared for RNA extraction. To determine the response of cAMP to ACTH stimulation the cells were grown in 24-well plates (1.5 million cells per well) in TIS medium. Cells were pretreated with and without AG (3-300 µM) for 48 h. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with and without ACTH (10 nM) or forskolin (10 µM) for 10 min.

Steroid determination and cyclic AMP analysis

Cortisol, aldosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) were determined in the supernatant from about 1.0 million cells/ml by radioimmunoassay (DPC Biermann, Bad Nauheim, Germany) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Cyclic adenosine-3’,5’- monophosphate was measured by means of an RIA (Amersham Buchler) on whole cell suspensions after ethanol extraction to determine the intracellular cAMP content.

RNA extraction and Northern analysis

Total RNA was extracted using the guanidinium isothio- cyante method (RNeasy kit, Qiagen). The RNA content was estimated by spectrophotometry. Twenty-five micro- grams total RNA were denatured in 2.2 M formaldehyde and electrophoresed in a 1% agarose-formaldehyde gel. The integrity of the major RNA species was examined under UV light to ensure consistency between lanes. The RNA was blotted by capillary transfer onto a nylon

Table 1 Dose-dependent effect of AG on steroid biosynthesis and cell proliferation in the NCI-h295 cell line. Cells were incubated for 48 h with AG, ACTH, forskolin (FSK), hydrocortisone (F), metyrapone (MTP) or combinations of these compounds as indicated. The steroid concentrations in the supernatant and the cell number are expressed as a percentage of untreated control cells (=100%). Values are the mean ± S.E.M. of 3 separate experiments. Control cells secreted 1075 ng cortisol/106 cells/48 h, 95 ng DHEA-S/106 cells/48 h and 5 ng aldosterone/106 cells/48 h. Note that AG treatment did not influence cell growth whereas stimulation of the protein kinase A pathway with forskolin reduced cell proliferation of the NCI-h295 cell line
Cortisol (% of control)DHEA-S (% of control)Aldosterone (% of control)Cell number (% of control)
Control100·0±4100·0±9100·0±2100.0±8
AG (300 µM)1.3 ±18·2 ±16.1 ±196·9±6
AG (30 µM)23.7 ±140·6 ± 323.6±3106·9±8
AG (3 µM)90.2 ± 195.0±691·1 ±291·5±2
MTP (300 μ.Μ)3.0± 111.5±29.9±198·9±9
AG (300 µM) +ACTH (10 nM)1.3 ±18·8±28.8±193·2 ±7
AG (300 μM) + FSK (10 μM)5.3 ± 119.7 ±611.6±167·9± 14
AG (300 µM) +F (12 µM)17.2 ±112.8 ±188·5±8
MTP (300 μ.Μ) +FSK (12 μΜ)5.1 ± 128·2 ±215.1 ± 271·1±4
ACTH (10 nM)144·3 ±5189.3 ± 16134·4± 1391.8±8
FSK (10 μM)418.0± 16627·2 ±95305·2 ± 3269.6±6

membrane and cross-linked by exposure to UV radiation. Prehybridization was carried out at 68 ℃ with Quickhyb solution for 1 h. Hybridization was performed in the same buffer at 68 ℃ for 1 h using a 1061 base pair, PCR- generated fragment of the human ACTH-R probe (Reincke et al. 1997) labeled with [@32-P]dCTP (Random Primed DNA Labeling Kit, Boehringer Mannheim, Germany). Unincorporated nucleotides were separated from radiolabeled DNA probes by NucTrap purification columns. After washing at 60 ℃ twice for 15 min in 1 × SSC and twice for 15 min in 0.5 × SSC (each con- taining 0.1% SDS), the blots were exposed to a Kodak X-OMAT-DS film (Kodak, Fernwald, Germany) at -78 ℃ with intensifying screens.

The blots were stripped and rehybridized with a PCR- generated angiotensin II receptor type 1 cDNA (Nawata et al. 1995) and with a mouse ß-actin cDNA probe for standardization (Stratagene). The relative intensity of the major hybridization signals (ACTH-R, 1.8 kb transcript; angiotensin II receptor type 1, 2-3 kb transcript) was quantified by scanning densitometry. Autoradiographic images were digitalized with a video camera and a Macintosh PowerMac 7100 computer-based image analy- sis system using the IMAGE program (NIMH, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, USA). The results were expressed as a percentage of the untreated control cells (=100%) after normalization for ß-actin expression.

Statistical analysis

All results are expressed as means ± S.E.M. Significances of differences were evaluated by ANOVA (Statview 4-51). A value of P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Treatment of NCI-h295 cells for 48 h with AG led to a dose-dependent decrease of the cortisol biosynthesis. The secretion of other steroids (DHEA-S and aldosterone) was suppressed in a similar manner (Table 1). Incubation with AG did not affect the cell viability which was greater than 90% by trypan blue inclusion in all experiments. In cell proliferation experiments control cells had a population doubling time of 70 h while cells treated with 300 µM AG still doubled in 78 h. After 48 h there was no significant difference in cell number between the AG-treated groups and control cells (Table 1).

Incubation of the cells for 48 h with AG significantly reduced ACTH-R mRNA expression in a dose- dependent fashion while the angiotensin II receptor type 1 mRNA abundance was unaffected. In contrast, forskolin increased the accumulation of ACTH-R mRNA, de- creased the expression of angiotensin II receptor type 1 mRNA, and decreased cell proliferation, as shown in part previously (Mountjoy et al. 1994, Bird et al. 1995b) (Fig. 1A,B, Table 1).

To investigate the functional significance of reduced ACTH-R mRNA levels, we evaluated the cAMP response of NCI-h295 cells to ACTH and forskolin. Forty-eight hours incubation with AG did not influence baseline cellular cAMP synthesis (300 µM AG, 746 ± 25; 30 µM AG, 864 ±3; 3 uM AG, 734 ±41 vs control cells, 796 ± 21 fmol/well/10 min; P=not significant). However, ACTH-stimulated cAMP accumulation was significantly reduced after pretreatment with AG in doses of more than 30 uM indicating reduced functional ACTH-R expression (Fig. 2). In parallel experiments,

Figure 1 Effect of adrenostatic treatment with AG and forskolin (FSK) (10 µM) on ACTH-R mRNA and angiotensin II receptor type 1 mRNA expression in the NCI-h295 cell line. (A) Northern blot of ACTH-R mRNA, angiotensin II receptor type 1 mRNA (AT-1-R) and ß-actin mRNA expression. (B) Mean ACTH-R mRNA expression ± S.E.M. of the 1.8 kb transcript as a percentage of control cells (100%) normalized for ß-actin expression is shown. Results were significantly different between groups (P<0-01).

A

control

300AM AG

30AM AG

3 AM AG

FSK

ACTH-R

AT-1-R

B-actin

B

ACTH-R mRNA expression (%)

300

200

100

0

control

300μM AG

30μM AG

3UM AG

10uM FSK

kb

4.0

— 3.4

- 1.8

- 2.3

-1,9

after preincubation with 300 µM AG, the forskolin- induced cAMP synthesis was still present (AG alone, 746 ± 35 vs AG/forskolin, 1082 ± 36 vs forskolin alone, 1254 ± 26 fmol/well/10 min) demonstrating that reduced responsiveness to ACTH was not due to diminished adenylyl cyclase activity.

Stimulation of the protein kinase A pathway by simul- taneous incubation of ACTH (10 nM) or forskolin (10 µM) together with AG was not able to overcome the steroid biosynthesis inhibition, but reversed the inhibitory effects of AG on the ACTH-R mRNA expression to baseline without restoring full response (Table 1 and Fig. 3). Similar effects on ACTH-R expression were seen with incubation of metyrapone with or without forskolin (Fig. 4). This demonstrates that cAMP is one of the components involved in ACTH-R regulation indepen- dent of steroid biosynthesis. On the other hand, incubation of cortisol (12 uM) together with AG showed a significant up-regulation of the ACTH-R mRNA compared with

Figure 2 Effect of pretreatment with AG on the ACTH-induced cAMP response in the NCI-h295 cell line. Cells were pretreated in triplicate with or without AG (3-300 µM) for 48 h. The mean cAMP synthesis ± S.E.M. over baseline as a percentage of control cells (100%) is shown. There were significant differences between groups (P<0.01). The ACTH-induced cAMP synthesis of control cells was 1130 ± 118 fmol/well/10 min.

ACTH induced cAMP synthesis (%)

120

100

T

80

60

40

20

0

T

control

300μM AG

30UM AG

3UM AG

cells incubated with AG only, indicating that gluco- corticoids at higher concentrations may also influence ACTH-R expression (Fig. 3).

Discussion

Our study shows that incubation of the NCI-h295 cell line with AG suppresses the ACTH-R mRNA abundance in a dose-dependent fashion. This down-regulation could either be caused by decreased gene expression or by diminished transcript accumulation via reduced RNA stability. Decreased ACTH-R mRNA levels are paralleled by a profound reduction of the cAMP response to ACTH, demonstrating reduced expression of functional ACTH-R in this system. The actions of AG on ACTH-R mRNA expression in the NCI-h295 cell line can be reversed with both forskolin and cortisol suggesting that, in addition to the protein kinase A pathway, the glucocorticoid signal transduction cascade is involved in regulation of ACTH-R expression.

Our data confirm and extend the recent report of Picard-Hagen et al. (1997) on the effects of glucocorticoids and AG on ACTH-R mRNA expression in ovine adrenocortical cells. In their experiments, AG (1000 µM) decreased ACTH-R mRNA expression, an effect which was prevented by concomitant treatment with dexametha- sone. In addition, AG diminished the ACTH-R up- regulation which can be induced by stimulation with ACTH. Our data show that the AG-induced ACTH-R down-regulation is not only present in normal ovine adrenocortical cells but can also be demonstrated in a human adrenocortical tumor cell line. It can, therefore, be expected that AG modulates ACTH-R expression in vivo.

Figure 3 Effects of simultaneous incubation of 300 µM AG with and without 10 nM ACTH, 12 uM cortisol (F) or 10 µM forskolin (FSK) on ACTH-R mRNA expression in the NCI-h295 cell. (A) Northern blot of ACTH-R mRNA expression (top) and ß-actin mRNA expression (bottom) from 3 different experiments. (B) Mean ACTH-R mRNA expression ± S.E.M. of the 1.8 kb transcript as a percentage of control (100%) normalized for ß-actin expression is shown. Results were significantly different between groups (P<0-01).

A

control

AG+ACTH

AG

ACTH

control

AG+F

AG+FSK

AG

control

AG

FSK

kb

— 4.0

ACTH-R

— 3.4

— 1.8

B-actin

- 1.9

B

ACTH-R mRNA expression (%)

300

200

100

0

control

AG

AG+ACTH

AG+F

AG+FSK

ACTH

FSK

Figure 4 Effect of 300 uM metyrapone (MTP) with or without 10 µM forskolin (FSK) on ACTH-R mRNA expression in the NCI-h295 cells. The blot was hybridized with cDNAs of ACTH-R (top) and of ß-actin (bottom).

control

MTP

MTP+FSK

FSK

kb

— 4.0

ACTH-R

— 3.4

- 1.8

B-actin

- 1.9

Such an effect on ACTH-R number may be desirable, especially in patients with adrenal pathology. For example, in patients with non-secreting or virilizing adrenocortical carcinoma, ACTH may be one of the factors stimulating cell proliferation via the protein kinase A pathway or other second messengers. In a previous study we showed that 25% of adrenocortical carcinomas express ACTH-R levels similar to those of the normal adrenal cortex (Reincke et al. 1997) Down-regulation of ACTH-R expression in these tumors could desensitize the tumor cells to the stimulatory action of ACTH.

We used the NCI-h295 cell line to determine the effects of AG on ACTH-R expression. This cell line is

derived from a human functional adrenocortical carcinoma and has been maintained in cell culture since 1981. It displays a differentiated cellular phenotype with produc- tion of more than 30 different steroids of the mineralo- corticoid, glucocorticoid and adrenal androgen pathways (Gazdar et al. 1990, Rainey et al. 1994). The coexpression of multiple P450 enzymes in cells of the NCI-h295 cell line resembles the steroidogenesis found in the fetal adrenal gland (Staels et al. 1993). In addition to P450 enzymes, the cell line expresses functional receptors for angiotensin II (Bird et al. 1993, 1994, 1995a), ACTH (Mountjoy et al. 1994) and insulin-like growth factor-I (Reincke et al. 1996). Regulation of ACTH-R expression in this cell line seems to be similar to that of the normal human adrenal cortex, although the magnitude of the responses to stimu- lation by ACTH is smaller because of a lower number of ACTH-Rs. Whereas the NCI-h295 cell line - with some limitations - may serve as a model of the functional neoplastic adrenal cortex, other tumor cell lines are less suitable for our purposes: in the case of the human SW-13 cell line because of missing ACTH-R expression, in the case of the mouse Y-1 cell line because of the lack of ability to synthesize cortisol due to missing 17a- hydroxylase expression.

The observed suppression of ACTH-R expression in the NCI-h295 cell line seems to be a specific and substance-related effect: AG was used in a dosage within the ‘therapeutic range’ (Meyer 1994), in contrast to other

studies which employed higher concentrations up to 1000 µM (Darbeida & Durand 1987, Urban et al. 1990, Picard-Hagen et al. 1997). AG acts by inhibition of P450 scc and aromatase activity with an IC50 of 16-40 uM (Vanden Bossche 1992). The plasma levels in patients treated with 1000 mg AG/day reach 70 umol/l (Strocchi et al. 1991). In our system, AG in concentrations of 300 µM did not significantly influence cell viability and cell number, thus arguing against a toxic effect of this compound. This is also supported by the unchanged mRNA abundance of the angiotensin-II receptor type 1. Therefore, we believe that modulation of ACTH-R expression is a new and substance-related pharmacological effect of AG. The mechanisms involved appear to be cAMP-independent, since basal cAMP production was not changed by AG. We also observed down-regulation of ACTH-R mRNA abundance by metyrapone, an inhibitor of P450 11ß-hydroxylase which converts 11- deoxycortisol to cortisol. Similar to AG, metyrapone was used in a dosage within the ‘therapeutic range’ (Jubiz et al. 1970) which did not influence cell viability. This suggests that the ACTH-R modulation is not restricted to AG but may be a general effect of this class of substances.

The expression of ACTH receptor mRNA and ACTH binding sites of normal human and bovine adrenocortical cells is up-regulated 1-2- to 20-fold by exposure to ACTH (Durand & Locatelli 1980, Penhoat et al. 1989, Saez et al. 1989, Rainey et al. 1991, Penhoat et al. 1993, 1994, Lebrethon et al. 1994a,b, Morita et al. 1995, Penhoat et al. 1995). This effect is mediated through the cAMP signal transduction cascade since it can be mimicked by treat- ment with forskolin and cAMP. Accordingly, several putative cAMP response elements have been identified in the promoter of the human ACTH-R gene (Naville et al. 1996), suggesting direct stimulation of ACTH-R transcription by cAMP. In addition, up-regulation of ACTH-R expression by angiotensin II through non- protein kinase A pathways has been reported (Mountjoy et al. 1994, Lebrethon et al. 1994b, Penhoat et al. 1994). In vivo, down-regulation of ACTH-R mRNA has been shown in rats treated with dexamethasone i.p. suppressing plasma ACTH levels (Morita et al. 1995). Similarly, ACTH-R mRNA expression was low in a knock-out mouse model in which the pro-opiomelanocortin pro- moter was deleted and consecutively low plasma ACTH concentrations were obtained (Allen et al. 1995). ACTH-R expression in neoplastic adrenal tissue seems to be regulated by additional factors other than plasma ACTH, since high ACTH-R mRNA levels have been found in adrenal adenomas of patients with adrenal Cushing’s syndrome and suppressed plasma ACTH (Morita et al. 1995, Reincke et al. 1997, 1998).

It is noteworthy that concomitant incubation of AG with forskolin reversed ACTH-R expression to baseline without giving full response. This supports the concept that AG may act through more than one pathway or it can

be explained by an AG-inducible suppressor of ACTH-R transcription. Recently, in the mouse ACTH-R gene promotor, binding of a transcriptional repressor or silencer has been identified between position - 1236 bp and -908 bp (Cammas et al. 1997). It has been postulated that this factor is responsible for tissue-specific expression of the ACTH-R in ACTH target tissues. Induction of such a repressor by AG in our system could explain why the forskolin effect on ACTH-R expression remained impaired during AG treatment. However, other potential mechanisms of action of AG may involve interaction with the steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1), an orphan member of the nuclear receptor superfamily (Lala et al. 1992) or with its potential oxysterol ligands (Lala et al. 1997). SF-1 binding sites have been identified in the mouse and human ACTH-R promotor (Naville et al. 1996), and transfection studies showed enhanced ACTH-R transcription if the SF-1 coding region was co-transfected with the mouse ACTH-R promotor into fibroblast L-cells (Cammas et al. 1997).

Apparently an important factor for the observed ACTH-R down-regulation is inhibition of glucocorticoid production by AG. Glucocorticoids enhance the ACTH- induced cAMP or cortisol response in adrenal cells or guinea pig adrenal glands, probably via increased ACTH-R expression (Darbeida & Durand 1987, 1988, 1990, Mokuda et al. 1997). Recently, Picard-Hagen et al. (1997) demonstrated convincingly that glucocorticoids stimulate corticotropin receptor mRNA levels in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Dexamethasone at 10-6 M induced a mean increase of 144 ± 11% over control. This enhancing effect was specific for glucocorticoids since the anti glucocorticoid RU486 blocked the effect of dexa- methasone, whereas other steroids such as testosterone did not modify ACTH-R mRNA levels. In our experiments using the physiological glucocorticoid, cortisol, concen- trations of 12 umol/l (equivalent to the cortisol concen- trations achieved by forskolin stimulation in our system) induced a significant ACTH-R mRNA up-regulation counteracting the effects of AG. This glucocorticoid- mediated effect on ACTH-R expression suggests an ultra-short positive intra-adrenal feedback mechanism within the zona fasciculata by which increased glucocor- ticoid production sensitizes zona fasciculata cells to the stimulatory action of ACTH. However, a glucocorticoid response element has been identified only in the mouse, but not in the human ACTH-R gene promoter (Naville et al. 1996, Cammas et al. 1997).

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr A F Gazdar (National Cancer Institute, NIH, USA) for the gift of the NCI-h295 cell line. This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungs- gemeinschaft (Re 752/5-4).

References

Allen RG, Carey C, Parker JD, Mortrud MT, Mellon SH & Low MJ 1995 Targeted ablation of pituitary pre-proopiomelanocortin cells by herpes simplex virus-1: thymidine kinase differentially regulates mRNA encoding the adrenocorticotropin receptor and aldosterone synthase in the mouse adrenal gland. Molecular Endocrinology 9 1005-1016.

Armelin HA, Lotfi CFP & Lepique AP 1996 Regulation of growth by ACTH in the Y-1 line of mouse adrenocortical cell. Endocrine Research 22 373-383.

Arola J, Heikkila P, Voutilainen R & Kahri AI 1994 Protein kinase C signal transduction pathway in ACTH-induced growth effect of rat adrenocortical cells in primary culture. Journal of Endocrinology 141 285-293.

Bird IM, Hanley NA, Word RA, Mathis JM, McCarthy JL, Mason JI & Rainey WE 1993 Human NCI-h295 adrenocortical carcinoma cells: a model for angiotensin-II-responsive aldosterone secretion. Endocrinology 133 1555-1561.

Bird IM, Mason JI & Rainey WE 1994 Regulation of type 1 angiotensin II receptor messenger ribonucleic acid expression in human adrenocortical carcinoma H295 cells. Endocrinology 134 2468-2474. Bird IM, Mason JI & Rainey WE 1995a Hormonal regulation of angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression and AT1-R mRNA levels in human adrenocortical cells. Endocrine Research 21 169-182.

Bird IM, Word RA, Clyne C, Mason JI & Rainey WE 1995b Potassium negatively regulates angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in human adrenocortical H295R cells. Hypertension 25 M29-34.

Boston BA & Cone RD 1996 Characterization of melanocortin receptor subtype expression in murine adipose tissue and in the 3T3-L1 cell line. Endocrinology 137 2043-2050.

Cammas FM, Pullinger GD, Barker S & Clark AJ 1997 The mouse adrenocorticotropin receptor gene: cloning and characterization of its promoter and evidence for a role for the orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1. Molecular Endocrinology 11 867-876.

Darbeida H & Durand P 1987 Glucocorticoid enhancement of adrenocorticotropin-induced 3’,5’-cyclic adenosine monophosphate production by cultured ovine adrenocortical cells. Endocrinology 121 1051-1055.

Darbeida H & Durand P 1988 Glucocorticoid enhancement of glucocorticoid production by cultured ovine adrenocortical cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 872 200-208.

Darbeida H & Durand P 1990 Mechanism of glucocorticoid enhancement of the responsiveness of ovine adrenocortical cells to adrenocorticotropin. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 166 1183-1191.

Darbeida H, Naaman E & Durand P 1987 Glucocorticoid induction of the maturation of ovine fetal adrenocortical cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 145 999-1005.

Durand P & Locatelli A 1980 Up regulation of corticotrophin receptors by ACTH1-24 in normal and hypophysectomized rabbits. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 96 447-456.

Gazdar AF, Oie HK, Shackleton CH, Chen TR, Triche TJ, Myers CE, Chrousos GP, Brennan MF, Stein CA & La Rocca RV 1990 Establishment and characterization of a human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line that expresses multiple pathways of steroid biosynthesis. Cancer Research 50 5488-5496.

Jubiz W, Matsukura S, Meikle AW, Harada G, West CD & Tyler FH 1970 Plasma metyrapone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, cortisol and desoxycortisol levels. Archives of Internal Medicine 125 468-471.

Lala DS, Rice DA & Parker KL 1992 Steroidogenic factor 1, a key regulator of steroidogenic enzyme expression, is the mouse homolog of fushi tarazu-factor 1. Molecular Endocrinology 6 1249-1258.

Lala DS, Syka PM, Lazarchik SB, Mangelsdorf DJ, Parker KL & Heyman RA 1997 Activation of the orphan nuclear receptor steroidogenic factor 1 by oxysterols. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94 4895-4900.

Latronico AC, Reincke M, Mendonca BB, Arai K, Mora P, Allolio B, Wajchenberg BL, Chrousos GP & Tsigos C 1995 No evidence for oncogenic mutations in the adrenocorticotropin receptor gene in human adrenocortical neoplasms. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 80 875-877.

Lebrethon MC, Jaillard C, Naville D, Begeot M & Saez JM 1994a Regulation of corticotropin and steroidogenic enzyme mRNAs in human fetal adrenal cells by corticotropin, angiotensin-II and transforming growth factor B1. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 106 137-143.

Lebrethon MC, Naville D, Begeot M & Saez JM 1994b Regulation of corticotropin receptor number and messenger RNA in cultured human adrenocortical cells by corticotropin and angiotensin II. Journal of Clinical Investigation 93 1828-1833.

Light K, Jenkins PJ, Weber A, Perrett C, Grossman A, Pistorello M, Asa SL, Clayton RN & Clark AJ 1995 Are activating mutations of the adrenocorticotropin receptor involved in adrenal cortical neoplasia? Life Sciences 56 1523-1527.

Magenis RE, Smith L, Nadeau JH, Johnson KR, Mountjoy KG & Cone RD 1994 Mapping of the ACTH, MSH and neural (MC3 and MC4) melanocortin receptors in mouse and human. Mammalian Genome 5 503-508.

Meyer FP 1994 Indicative therapeutic and toxic drug concentrations in plasma: a tabulation. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 32 71-81.

Mokuda O, Ubukata E & Sakamoto Y 1997 Glucocorticoids potentiate effect of ACTH on cortisol secretion in isolated perfused guinea pig adrenal glands. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology and Diabetes 105 119-121.

Morita TM, Imai T, Murata Y, Kambe F, Funahashi H, Takagai H & Seo H 1995 Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) increases the expression of its own receptor gene. Endocrine Journal 42 475-480. Mountjoy KG, Robbins LS, Mortrud MT & Cone RD 1992 The cloning of a family of genes that encode the melanocortin receptors. Science 257 1248-1251.

Mountjoy KG, Bird IM, Rainey WE & Cone RD 1994 ACTH induces up-regulation of ACTH receptor mRNA in mouse and human adrenocortical cell lines. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 99 R17-R20.

Naville D, Penhoat A, Barjhoux L, Jaillard C, Fontanay S, Saez J, Durand P & Bégeot M 1996 Characterization of the human ACTH receptor gene and in vitro expression. Endocrine Research 22 337-348.

Nawata H, Takayanagi R, Ohnaka K, Sakai Y, Imasaki K, Yanase T, Ikuyama S, Tanaka S & Ohe K 1995 Type 1 angiotensin II receptors of adrenal tumors. Steroids 60 28-34.

Parissenti AM, Kirwan AF, Kim SA, Colantonio CM & Schimmer BP 1996 Molecular strategies for the dominant inhibition of protein kinase C. Endocrine Research 22 621-631.

Penhoat A, Jaillard C & Saez JM 1989 Corticotropin positively regulates its own receptors and cAMP response in cultured bovine adrenal cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 86 4978-4981.

Penhoat A, Jaillard C & Saez JM 1993 Identification and characterization of corticotropin receptor in bovine and human adrenals. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 44 21-27.

Penhoat A, Jaillard C & Saez JM 1994 Regulation of bovine adrenal cell corticotropin receptor mRNA levels by corticotropin (ACTH) and angiotensin-II (A-II). Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 103 R7-R10.

Penhoat A, Lebrethon MC, Begeot M & Saez JM 1995 Regulation of ACTH receptor mRNA and binding sites by ACTH and angiotensin II in cultured human and bovine adrenal fasciculata cells. Endocrine Research 21 157-168.

Picard-Hagen N, Penhoat A, Hue D, Jaillard C & Durand P 1997 Glucocorticoids enhance corticotropin receptor mRNA levels in ovine adrenocortical cells. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 19 29-36.

Journal of Endocrinology (1998) 159, 35-42 Downloaded from Bioscientifica.com at 04/02/2026 08:02:34AM via National Institute of Health -site licence- and National Library of Medicine -print-

Rainey WE, McAllister JM, Byrd EW, Mason JI & Carr BR 1991 Regulation of corticotropin responsiveness in human fetal adrenal cells. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 165 1649-1654. Rainey WE, Bird IM & Mason JI 1994 The NCI-h295 cell line is a pluripotent model for human adrenocortical studies. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 100 45-50.

Reincke M, Fassnacht M, Väth S, Mora P & Allolio B 1996 Adrenal incidentalomas: a manifestation of the metabolic syndrome? Endocrine Research 22 757-761.

Reincke M, Beuschlein F, Latronico AC, Arlt W, Chrousos GP & Allolio B 1997 Expression of adrenocorticotropic hormone receptor mRNA in human adrenocortical neoplasms: correlation with P450 scc expression. Clinical Endocrinology 46 619-626. Reincke M, Beuschlein F, Menig G, Hofmockel G, Arlt W, Lehmann R, Karl M & Allolio B 1998 Localization and expression of adrenocorticotropic hormone receptor mRNA in normal and neoplastic human adrenal cortex. Journal of Endocrinology 156 415-423. Saez JM, Begeot M & Durand P 1989 ACTH receptors. Annales of Endocrinologie (Paris) 50 409-417.

Slominski A, Ermak G & Mihm M 1996 ACTH receptor, CYP11A1, CYP17 and CYP21A2 genes are expressed in skin. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism 81 2746-2749.

Staels B, Hum DW & Miller WL 1993 Regulation of steroidogenesis in NCI-h295 cells: a cellular model of the human fetal adrenal. Molecular Endocrinology 7 423-433.

Strocchi E, Camaggi CM, Martoni A, Cellerino R, Miseria S, Malacarne P, Indelli M, Balli M, Bonciarelli G, Ambroso G, Bichisao E, Robustelli Della Cuna G & Pannuti F 1991 Aminoglutethimide in advanced breast cancer: plasma levels and clinical results after low and high doses. Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology 27 451-455.

Urban RJ, Garmey JC, Shupnik MA & Veldhuis JD 1990 Insulin-like growth factor type-I increases concentrations of messenger ribonucleic acid encoding cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme in primary cultures of porcine granulosa cells. Endocrinology 127 2481-2488.

Vanden Bossche H 1992 Inhibitors of P450-dependent steroid biosynthesis: from research to medical treatment. Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 43 1003-1021.

Yamazaki T, Higuchi K, Kominami S & Takemori S 1996 15-Lipoxygenase metabolite(s) of arachidonic acid mediates adrenocorticotropin action in bovine adrenal steroidogenesis. Endocrinology 137 2670-2675.

Received 11 November 1997 Revised manuscript received 23 February 1998 Accepted 12 May 1998