WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
CASE REPORT
Bilateral adrenocortical carcinoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and a novel mutation in the MEN1 gene
John E Griniatsos1*, Nikoletta Dimitriou1, Athanassios Zilos2, Stratigoula Sakellariou3, Konstantinos Evangelou3, Smaragda Kamakari4, Penelope Korkolopoulou3, Gregory Kaltsas2
Abstract
The incidence of adrenal involvement in MEN1 syndrome has been reported between 9 and 45%, while the incidence of adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) in MEN1 patients has been reported between 2.6 and 6%. In the literature data only unilateral development of ACCs in MEN1 patients has been reported. We report a 31 years-old female MEN1-patient, in whom hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands, prolactinoma, non functioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma and functioning bilateral adrenal carcinomas were diagnosed. Interestingly, a not previously described in the literature data, novel germline mutation (p.E45V) in exon 2 of MEN1 gene, was detected. The association of exon 2 mutation of the MEN1 gene with bilateral adrenal carcinomas in MEN1 syndrome, should be further investigated.
Introduction
Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an auto- somal dominant disorder with penetrance reaching 100% with age [1].
It is characterized by parathyroid glands hyperplasia, anterior pituitary gland tumours and pancreatic islets tumours [2]. However, other endocrine and non-endocrine lesions, such as carcinoids of the bronchi [3], gastrointest- inal tract [4] and thymus [5], lipomas, angiofibromas and collagenomas [6,7] can also occur with low frequency, while combinations of more than twenty different endo- crine and non-endocrine tumours and lesions have been reported [8-12].
A simple definition of MEN 1 can not cover all index cases and all families. As a practical definition, sporadic MEN1 is characterised by the occurrence of primary tumours involving two of the three main MEN1 related endocrine tissues within a single patient, while familial MEN1 is defined as at least one MEN1 case plus at least one first degree relative with one of those three tumors [13].
The incidence of adrenal lesions in MEN1 patients varies between 9 and 45% [14-20] and they usually
develop in patients with mutations in exons 2 and 10 [18]. Other authors stated that they are mainly unilateral (55-79%) [18,20-22], others addressed them as mainly bilateral (60%) [15], but all agree that the majority of these lesions are hyperplastic and nonfunctioning, caus- ing minimal morbidity. Functioning tumors like pheo- chromocytoma or tumors causing hypercortisolemia and hyperaldosteronism are rare manifestations of MEN1 [23]. The incidence of adreonocortical carcinoma (ACC) in MEN1 patients has been reported between 2.6 [20] and 6% [17,18,22]. Although involvement of the adrenal gland has been reported in approximately 40% of MEN1 patients and has been found to represent bilateral hyper- plasia, adenoma and in a few cases carcinoma, bilateral adrenal carcinoma has not been previously reported.
Herewith, we report a 31 years-old female patient with sporadic form of MEN1 in whom functioning bilateral adrenocortical carcinomas were diagnosed. Interestingly enough, a novel germline mutation in exon 2 of MEN1 gene, was detected.
Case Report
A 31 years-old female patient with the preoperative diagnosis of MEN1, was referred by the Endocrinologists to the 1st Department of Surgery, for further evaluation and treatment.
* Correspondence: johngriniatsos@yahoo.com
11st Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
BioMed Central
On clinical examination, centripetal obesity, moon face, fat deposition over the thoracocervical spine (buf- falo hump), excessive terminal hair in various parts of her body and four angiofibromas in her face, were observed. Her arterial blood pressure was moderately abnormal (155/80 mmHg), while she reported menstrual irregularity (infrequent uterine bleeding) and easy bruis- ing. She was suffering from diabetes mellitus since 2002 and she was currently on glargine insulin, whereas she reported having been prescribed Dopamine agonists for her pituitary prolactinoma lesion. Her family history was insignificant
The preoperative imaging investigation of the patient included: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the head disclosing a 1.4 x 1.3 cm pituitary adenoma,
cervical ultrasound and Tc99 m Sestamibi-scans both disclosing hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands, abdom- inal MRI scan and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) both disclosing a 4.5 x 3.0 cm tumor in the body and tail of the pancreas, fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) of the pancreatic tumor under EUS guidance concluding in histological findings compatible to neuroendocrine tumor, somatostatin receptor imaging with Indium 111 (OctreoScan®) disclosing radionuclide material uptake in the left upper quadrant of the abdominal cavity at some point between the left lobe of the liver and the spleen, while in the abdominal MRI scan bilateral adre- nal tumors (right adrenal 8.0 X 4.5 cm and left adrenal 7.5 × 5.5 cm) (Figure 1), as well as a fully calcified ecto- pic left kidney into the pelvis, were detected. Finally, a
Sonate 534843
53484J
MR
534643
-08-Jun-77. F. 31Y
MR 2004A 00-Jun-77. F. 31Y
MR
2004A
“08-Jun-77. F. 31Y
2004A 0
HFS
HES
.LPR STUDY 1
.LPR
STUDY 1
STUDY 1 06-Nov-08 11:47:51 21 IMA 44 / 44
06-Nov-08
ZA- NOV-09
11737 21 IMA 45 / 16
21 IMA 43 / 44
R
R
F
R
3
10cm
10cm
10cm
MF 1.22
MF 1.22
MF 1.22
TR 48
TR 4.8
TR 4,8
SP H85 2 TE 22 SL JSI TA 18.90
SP H81.7 TE 2.2 SL 35 TA 18 90
SP H78 2
TA 18 90
BW 300.0
FoV 275-400 BW 300.0
SL 3.5
210 5121 M/ND/NORM
FOV 275 400
MIND/NORM
210-512 1 M/ND/NORM
210-5125 Tra
A1/SAT?/FS
Tra
A1/SAT2/FS
Tra
A1/SAT2/FS BO1 2;SP2-4 “13d1 / 10
BO1.2 SP2-4
1
BO1 2 SP2-4
1
1
1001 / 10
-1301 /10
33sd43
08- Jun-77. F. 31Y
Sonata 534843
Sonata 534543
MR 2004A “08-Jun-77. F. 31Y
MR 2004A “08-Jun-77. F. 31Y HES
Sonata: MR 2004A
HES
HFS +LPH
STUDY 1 08-Nov-08
+LPH
STUDY 1.
.LPH
ÖS-Nov-08 og.hoy.00 11:47:51 21 IMA 39 / 44
STUDY 1
06-Nov-OB 11:47:51
11:47:51
4
+
21 IMA 40 / 44
21 IMA 38 / 44
R
R
R
1
MF 1.22
10cm
MF 1.22
10cm
MF 1.22
10cm
TR 48 TE 22 TA 18 90
TR 48
SP H67.7 TE 2.2
TR 4.8
SP H60.7
BW 300.0
SL 3.51 TA 18,90
MIND/NORM
FOV 275-400 PAY 2000 210’5121
SP H64 2 TE 22 SL 3.5 TA 18.90
M/ND/NORM
FoV 275-400 BW 300.0 210 530 210-512 | MIND/NORM
SL 35
FoV 275-400
Tra
210-5121 Tra
A1/SAT2/FS
Tra
BO1 2 SP2-4
1
A1/SAT2/FS
BO1.2.SP2-4
1
A1/SAT2/FS
1001 / 10
“1Od1 / 10
BO1.2 SP2-4
-13d1/10
1
530d43
“08-Jun-77. F. 31Y
Sonata 534843
MR 2004A 08-Jun-77. F. 31Y
Sonata 534843
MR 2004A “08-Jun-77, F. 31Y
Sonata
MR 2004A HFS +LPH
STUDY 1 06-Hov-08
HFS
.LPH
STUDY 1
HFS
.LPH
11:47:51 21 IMA 35 / 44
06-Nov-08 11:47651 21 IMA 34 / 44
STUDY 1 08-Nov-08 11:47:51 21 IMA 33 / 44
4
+
R
R
R
MF 1.22
10cm
MF 1.22
10cm
MF 1.22
10cm
TR 4.8
TA 18 90
TR 4.8
SP H50 2 TE 22
TR 48
₩ 200.0
SL 3.5 TA 18.90
SP H46.7 TE 22
SL 3,51 TA 18.90
SP H43 2
MINID/NORM
FOV 275-400 BUY 200.0
FOV 275-400 PWY X-
SL 3.5
FoV 275-400
DMSA renal scan disclosed only 17% renal function of the ectopic left kidney.
The preoperative hormonal evaluation of the patient is presented in Table 1. She was further submitted to an Overnight Dexamethasone Suppression Test (ODST), which failed to suppress the morning cortisol levels- which were 627 nM/L (< 50 nM/L), whereas the Urinary Free Cortisol levels were elevated- 473 µg/24h (55-286), signifying hyper-cortisolism. The ODST, in concordance with the ACTH level, unmasked a Cushing syndrome caused due to adrenal production of cortisol. Moreover, the possibility of adrenocortical carcinoma was consid- ered high in the light of the high levels of androgens. Due to moderate high levels of arterial blood pressure (155/80 mmHg), she had her 24 hours urine output collected. 800mL of urine were collected and the laboratory results were as follows: Adrenaline 3 µg/24h (1.7-22.4), Noradre- naline 29 µg/24h (12-85), Metanefrine 337 µg/24h (100- 800), Normetanefrine 298 µg/24h (88-444), VMA 4 µg/ 24h (1.8-6.7) and Dopamine 47 µg/24h (65-400).
After the completion of the imaging investigation and the laboratory evaluation, the diagnosis of sporadic form of MEN1 syndrome consisting of: (i) a 1.4 x 1.3 cm pro- lactine producing pituitary adenoma, (ii) primary hyper- parathyroidism due to hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands, (iii) a 4.5 x 3.0 cm non functioning endocrine tumor in the body and tail of the pancreas and (iv) functioning bilateral adrenal tumors, was established.
The patient was submitted to an exploratory laparot- omy through a bilateral subcostal incision. She under- went distal pancreatectomy, splenectomy, bilateral
| Parameter | Normal values | Preoperative value | Postoperative value |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACTH | 1-50 pg/ml | 0.23 | |
| Cortisol | 260-720 nM | 834 | |
| Prolactin | 2.7-20 ng/ml | 25.7 | |
| Calcium | 8.6-10.2 mg/dl | 9.8 | |
| PTH | 8-76 pg/ml | 107 | |
| GH | 0-10 μIU/ml | 12 | |
| IGF | 114-492 ng/ml | 847 | |
| FSH | 1.8-9.4 mIU/ml | 0.42 | |
| LH | 0.8-10.4 mIU/ml | 1.1 | |
| TSH | 0.3-4 mU/l | 1.65 | |
| Testosterone | 0.1-0.8 ng/ml | 2 | 0.1 |
| 44 | 0.5-4.7 ng/ml | 14.7 | 0.38 |
| Androstendione | |||
| DHEAS | 99-340 µg/dl | 950 | 0.01 |
| Phosphorus | 2.7-4.5 mg/dl | 2.7 | |
| CgA | 19-98 ng/ml | 187 | |
| CA-125 | < 30 U/ml | 227 | 40 |
adrenalectomy and nephrectomy of the ectopic left kidney. Parathyroidectomy was postponed until the development of clinical or laboratory findings compatible to hyperparathyroidism. The patient had an uneventful postoperative recovery and she was discharge on the 7th postoperative day.
The histological findings were as follows: Distal pan- creas (size 9.5 x 5.1 × 2.8 cm). Grossly, the pancreatic tissue exhibited multiple cystic and hemorrhagic lesions ranging from 0.3 to 2 cm in maximum diameter. In the peripancreatic fat five lymphnodes measuring 0.4 to 0.6 cm, were detected. Microscopically, the pancreatic lesions corresponded to neoplastic tissue consisting of uniform neoplastic cells with scant eosinophilic cyto- plasm and stippled nuclei, arranged in nests and trabe- cula. There was mild to moderate nuclear atypia and the mitotic figures were less than 2 per 10 HPF (magni- fication X40). Neoplastic emboli in pancreatic vessels, as well as tumor nests in the peripancreatic fat were also evident. The tumor appeared to extend within less than 0.3 cm of the surgical margins. The resected lymph- nodes were free of metastatic deposits. The neoplastic cells exhibited immunopositivity for neuroendocrine markers (chromogranin and synaptophysin), while the proliferation index assessed by Ki-67 immunohistochem- istry was about 5%. Taking into account the above histo- logical observations (especially that the proliferation index was about 5%) as well as the data from the litera- ture, the diagnosis of well-differentiated endocrine carci- noma of the pancreas was established.
Both adrenals glands. The left one weighed 250 gr, mea- sured 10.1 × 7.3 × 4.5 cm and upon sectioning, a well cir- cumscribed brownish tumor with central calcification sizing 7.5 x 5.5 × 4.1 cm, was found. The right adrenal gland weighed 120gr and measured 10.5 x 5.5 x 3.7 cm. Gross examination revealed the presence of a tumor mea- suring 8 × 4 × 3 cm, with features similar to those of the left gland, but without central calcification. Histologically, both adrenal tumors showed features of adrenocortical neoplasms. The neoplastic population consisted of round to oval cells, with scant eosinophilic cytoplasm and moder- ate to marked nuclear pleomorphism, arranged in a loose growth pattern (Figure 2). Abnormal caryokinesis and inva- sion of venous and sinusoid vessels were also observed. Necrotic areas were present only in the tumor of the left adrenal gland. Immunohistochemically, the cells were Mel- anA and synaptophysin immunopositive. No immunostain- ing for cytoceratin, chromogranin, EMA and CEA was observed. The remaining non-neoplastic adrenal tissue showed nodular hyperplasia. Based on the above findings, both tumors corresponded to adrenocortical neoplasms with malignant potential, according to Weiss’s criteria.
Following these results, the patient as well as her mother and her sister were submitted to genetic test for
MEN1. A germline p.E45V mutation in exon 2 of the MEN1 gene was detected, while none of the rest mem- bers of the family expressed any genetic abnormality.
Due to the bilateral adrenalectomy she was prescribed on Hydrocortisone and Flurohydrocortisone repletion therapy. Her postoperative hormonal evaluation, soon after having been discharged, is presented in Table 1.
Discussion
In the present report we describe a young female MEN1- patient, in whom apart from the prolactine producing pituitary adenoma, the hyperplasia of the parathyroid glands and the well-differentiated non functioning pan- creatic endocrine carcinoma, functioning bilateral adreno- cortical carcinomas were diagnosed. A not previously described, novel germline mutation (p.E45V) in exon 2 of MEN1 gene was detected in the postoperative genetic test for MEN1.
MEN1 is a tumor suppressor gene located at chromo- some 11q13 loci, encoding a 67 kD nuclear protein of 610 amino acids, called menin [24]. Various types of mutations scattered throughout the 10 coding exons of the MEN1 gene inactivate the MEN1 gene.
Knudson’s two-hit model for tumorigenesis [10] addresses that the first hit can take place either in germ- line or in somatic tissue and compromise a small num- ber of bases. The mutations are distributed across the MEN1 reading frame, resulting in a great deal of novel mutations, approximately 50%, in the index cases. Mostly, they result in premature truncation of DNA sequence, inactivating menin protein. The second hit is usually a large chromosomal deletion, which lives no normal functional allele. The second hit is in somatic tissue and in most cases occurs postnataly.
The first clinical manifestation of MEN1 is hyperpar- athyroidism, mainly due to multiglandular hyperplasia, which usually affects more than 95% of all MEN1 patients [25]. Although there is no doubt that total para- thyroidectomy constitutes the treatment of choice for symptomatic hypercalcaemic MEN1 patients [2], the decision for the timing for the parathyroid surgery should take under account the severity of the PHPT symptoms, the circulating PTH and calcium levels, the presence of MEN1-associated endocrinopathies, espe- cially the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) and the patient’s age [26]. Since the patient we describe, was
asymptomatic, had no evidence of ZES, meeting only one (the age) of the proposed by the NIH criteria for the treatment of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyr- oidism [27], the parathyroidectomy was postponed for the future.
Pancreatic tumours occur in about 30-75% of MEN1 patients and are the second commonest clinical manifes- tation of MEN1 [28]. One third of pancreatic tumours are non functioning and clinically silent, but the major- ity of them produce excessive amounts of hormones such as gastrin, insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, neuro- tensin or vasoactive intestinal polypeptide and are asso- ciated with distinct clinical syndromes [2]. Pancreatic tumours can be multiple and scattered throughout the whole pancreas, ranging in size from micro-adenomas (slightly larger than unaffected islets) to macro- adenomas larger than 0.5 cm [26]. Endoscopic ultra- sound (EUS) constitutes the most sensitive imaging method for the detection of small pancreatic endocrine tumours in asymptomatic MEN1 patients (sensitivity > 75%), while the combination of EUS with Octreoscan scintigraphy, increases the pancreatic tumoural detection rate to 90% [29]. As general recommendation, patients with positive imaging studies and no evidence of unre- sectable metastases, should undergo surgical exploration with intraoperative ultrasound [10]. Surgery is always indicated for hormonal producing tumours, while for asymptomatic patients pancreatic surgery can be decided when the size of the lesion approaches 2 cm [26]. It is generally accepted that large tumours in the pancreatic body or tail should be treated by distal pan- createctomy and splenectomy [30]. The preoperative laboratory and imaging with EUS and Octreoscan work up of the patient we describe, disclosed a non hormonal producing but greater than 2 cm pancreatic tail tumour with no evidence of metastatic disease. Thus, the patient underwent an exploratory laparotomy, the intraoperative ultrasonography did not disclosed any other pancreatic lesion and distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy were performed.
The incidence of pituitary adenomas in MEN1 patients varies between 10 and 60% [13], while their symptoms depend on the type and the amount of the pituitary hormone secretion and/or the compression effects due to the size of the tumour [26]. Pituitary tumours can be successfully managed by drug therapy, reserving surgery and/or radiotherapy for large tumours or irresectable residual disease [2]. The lack of compres- sion symptoms explains why the patient we describe, was treated conservatively.
Regarding the adrenocortical lesions, DNA analysis for allelic loss at the MEN1 locus shown no loss of hetero- zygosity [15,31], probably suggesting that they are not a direct result of inactivation of the MEN1 gene.
Since the malignant potential of MEN1-related adrenal neoplasia is of important clinical significance, close bio- chemical and radiologic follow-up is recommended. Newly diagnosed adrenal lesions should undergone a control investigation after 6 months and in case of a stable lesion, control intervals of 2 years seem to be suf- ficient [32]. Adrenal lesions smaller than 3 cm are usually asymptomatic and endocrine-inactive with low malignant potential [32]. Although general agreement does not exist, several authors [2,18,22] recommend that adrenocortical tumours greater than 3 cm in diameter or growing lesion [32] should be surgically removed because of their malignant potential. Because both adre- nal lesions in the presented case were greater than 3 cm, bilateral adrenalectomy was performed.
In the patient we describe, a non functional, fully calci- fied ectopic pelvic kidney was also detected and surgically removed. Since ectopic kidneys are more susceptible to diseases such as nephrolithiasis, hydronephrosis, injury of aberrant vessels or overlying abdominal viscera and nerves or malignancy than the normally positioned ones, a non functional pelvic kidney requires removal [33].
Preoperatively, the patient we describe, had elevated (7.5-fold) serum CA-125 levels. It is well known the high false positive rate and the poor sensitivity and specificity of the CA-125. Although cardiovascular, lung and chronic liver diseases are the most frequent diagnoses in patients with increased CA-125, other intra-abdominal non-malignant non-hepatic diseases can also cause eleva- tion of the CA-125 [34], as in the present case.
Many proteins that localize to the nucleus contain a polybasic motif, the Nuclear Localization Signal (NLS), which is necessary for proper nuclear targeting. Menin contains two NLSs. Both NLS-1 (amino acid 479-497) and NLS-2 (amino acids 588-608) are present in the C-fourth of menin [35]. Menin binds to JunD transcrip- tion factor, a member of Activator Protein 1 family. JunD regulates transcription from certain promoters by binding to TRE consensus. Menin-JunD interaction involves the N-terminus (amino acids 1-40) and midre- gion (amino acids 323-428) of Menin and requires the N-terminus of JunD (amino acids 8-70). Menin’s tumor suppressor involves direct binding to JunD and inhibi- tion of JunD activated transcription [36].
The patient we describe harbors the germline p.E45V mutation of the MEN1 gene which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been previously described in the lit- erature data. It is a point mutation in exon 2 of MEN1 gene, in nucleotide 134 substituting Adenosine to Thymine, changing the Glutamic acid (GAG) to Valine (GTC) in the menin molecule. Although, pathogenetic mutations of glutamic acid either to lysine (p.E45K) or glykine (p.E45G) or alanine (p.E45A), have been pre- viously described [37], the close proximity of this amino
acid (amino acid 45) to the area (amino acids 1-40) of menin molecule responsive for Menin-JunD interaction, poses a possible explanation of the present tumorgenesis by disrupting Menin-JunD interaction, finally affecting the tumor suppression function.
In conclusion, we present a MEN1 patient with the novel p.E45V mutation in the exon 2 of the MEN1 gene, in whom bilateral ACC was detected. Whether this novel mutation predisposed to bilateral ACC devel- opment or whether bilateral ACC can also occur in MEN1 patients, remains to be proved.
Author details
11st Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 2Division of Endocrinology, Department of Pathologic Physiology Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 3Department of Pathology, Medical School, University of Athens, Athens, Greece. 4BioGenomica Genetic Tests Center, Athens, Greece.
Authors’ contributions
JG performed the operation and contributed to the preparation of the manuscript; ND assisted to the operation and wrote the manuscript; AZ prepared preoperatively and followed-up postoperatively the patient, wrote the manuscript and reviewed the literature; SS and KE performed the histopathology; SK performed the genetic test; PK performed the histopathology and immunohistochemistry; GK diagnosed the case, checked the final version of the manuscript and made significant comments. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Received: 22 March 2010 Accepted: 25 January 2011 Published: 25 January 2011
References
1. Marx SJ, Simonds WF: Hereditary hormone excess: genes, molecular pathways, and syndromes. Endocrine Rev 2005, 26:615-661.
2. Marini F, Falchetti A, Del Monte F: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases 2006, 1:38.
3. Debelenko LV, Brambilla E, Agarwal SK, Swalwell JI, Kester MB, Lubensky IA, Zhuang Z, Guru SC, Manickam P, Olufemi SE, Chandrasekharappa SC, Crabtree JS, Kim YS, Heppner C, Burns AL, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ, Liotta LA, Collins FS, Travis WD, Emmert-Buck MR: Identification of MEN1 gene mutations in sporadic carcinoid tumors of the lung. Hum Mol Genet 1997, 6:2285-2290.
4. Debelenko LV, Emmert-Buck MR, Zhuang Z, Epshteyn E, Moskaluk CA, Jensen RT, Liotta LA, Lubensky IA: The multiple endocrine neoplasia type I gene locus is involved in the pathogenesis of type II gastric carcinoids. Gastroenterology 1997, 113:773-781.
5. Teh BT: Thymic carcinoids in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Intern Med 1998, 243:501-504.
6. Darling TN, Skarulis MC, Steinberg SM, Marx SJ, Spiegel AM, Turner M: Multiple facial angiofibromas and collagenomas in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Arch Dermatol 1997, 133:853-857.
7. Pack S, Turner ML, Zhuang Z, Vortmeyer AO, Böni R, Skarulis M, Marx SJ, Darling TN: Cutaneous tumors in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 show allelic deletion of the MEN1 gene. J Invest Dermatol 1998, 110:438-440.
8. Agarwal SK, Lee Burns A, Sukhodolets KE, Kennedy PA, Obungu VH, Hickman AB, Mullendore ME, Whitten I, Skarulis MC, Simonds WF, Mateo C, Crabtree JS, Scacheri PC, Ji Y, Novotny EA, Garrett-Beal L, Ward JM, Libutti SK, Richard Alexander H, Cerrato A, Parisi MJ, Santa Anna-AS, Oliver B, Chandrasekharappa SC, Collins FS, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ: Molecular pathology of the MEN1 gene. Ann NY Acad Sci 2004, 1014:189-198.
9. Marx SJ: Molecular genetics of multiple endocrine neoplasia types 1 and 2. Nat Rev Cancer 2005, 5:367-375.
10. Doherty GM: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Surg Oncol 2005, 89:143-150.
11. Carrasco CA, González AA, Carvajal CA, Campusano C, Oestreicher E, Arteaga E, Wohllk N, Fardella CE: Novel intronic mutation of MEN1 gene causing familial isolated primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89:4124-4129.
12. Hao W, Skarulis MC, Simonds WF, Weinstein LS, Agarwal SK, Mateo C, James-Newton L, Hobbs GR, Gibril F, Jensen RT, Marx SJ: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 variant with frequent prolactinoma and rare gastrinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2004, 89:3776-3784.
13. Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A, Bilezikian JP, Beck-Peccoz P, Bordi C, Conte- Devolx B, Falchetti A, Gheri RG, Libroia A, Lips CJ, Lombardi G, Mannelli M, Pacini F, Ponder BA, Raue F, Skogseid B, Tamburrano G, Thakker RV, Thompson NW, Tomassetti P, Tonelli F, Wells SA Jr, Marx SJ: Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001, 86:5658-5671.
14. Burgess JR, Harle RA, Tucker P, Parameswaran V, Davies P, Greenaway TM, Shepherd JJ: Adrenal lesions in a large kindred with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Arch Surg 1996, 131:699-702.
15. Skogseid B, Larsson C, Lindgren PG, Kvanta E, Rastad J, Theodorsson E, Wide L, Wilander E, Oberg K: Clinical and genetic features of adrenocortical lesions in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992, 75:76-81.
16. Carty SE, Helm AK, Amico JA, Clarke MR, Foley TP, Watson CG, Mulvihill JJ: The variable penetrance and spectrum of manifestations of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Surgery 1998, 124:1106-1114.
17. Skogseid B, Rastad J, Gobl A, Larsson C, Backlin K, Juhlin C, Akerström G, Oberg K: Adrenal lesion in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Surgery 1995, 118:1077-1082.
18. Langer P, Cupisti K, Bartsch DK, Nies C, Goretzki PE, Rothmund M, Röher HD: Adrenal involvement in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. World J Surg 2002, 26:891-896.
19. Barzon L, Pasquali C, Grigoletto C, Pedrazzoli S, Boscaro M, Fallo F: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and adrenal lesions. J Urol 2001, 166:24-27.
20. Gibril F, Schumann M, Pace A, Jensen RT: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: a prospective study of 107 cases and comparison with 1009 cases from the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 2004, 83:43-83.
21. Chico A, Gallart L, Martín-Campos JM, Catasús L, Mayoral C, Mato E, Tortosa F, Bernà L, Rodríguez-Espinosa J, Blanco-Vaca F, Matías-Guiu X, de Leiva A, Mauricio D: Genetic, clinical, and biochemical analysis of unrelated Spanish families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type I. Endocr Pract 2000, 6:13-19.
22. Waldmann J, Bartsch DK, Kann PH, Fendrich V, Rothmund M, Langer P: Adrenal involvement in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: results of 7 years prospective screening. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2007, 392:437-443.
23. Schussheim DH, Skarulis MC, Agarwal SK, Simonds WF, Burns AL, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: new clinical and basic findings. Trends Endocrinol Metabol 2001, 12:173-178.
24. Chandrasekharappa SC, Guru SC, Manickam P, Olufemi SE, Collins FS, Emmert-Buck MR, Debelenko LV, Zhuang Z, Lubensky IA, Liotta LA, Crabtree JS, Wang Y, Roe BA, Weisemann J, Boguski MS, Agarwal SK, Kester MB, Kim YS, Heppner C, Dong Q, Spiegel AM, Burns AL, Marx SJ: Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science 1997, 276:404-407.
25. Phay EJ, Moley FJ, Lairmore CT: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasias. Semin Surg Oncol 2000, 18:324-332.
26. Falchetti A, Marini F, Luzi E, Tonelli F, Brandi ML: Multiple endocrine neoplasms. Best Prac Res Clin Rheumatol 2008, 22:149-163.
27. Bilezikian JP, Khan AA, Potts JT Jr: Guidelines for the management of asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: summary statement from the third international workshop. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94:335-339.
28. Akerstrom G, Hellman P: Surgery on neuroendocrine tumours. Best Prac Res Clin Endocrinol Metabol 2007, 21:87-109.
29. Rösch T, Lightdale CJ, Botet JF, Boyce GA, Sivak MV Jr, Yasuda K, Heyder N, Palazzo L, Dancygier H, Schusdziarra V: Localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 1992, 326:1721-1726.
30. Lairmore TC, Chen VY, DeBenedetti MK, Gillanders WE, Norton JA, Doherty GM: Duodenopancreatic resections in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Ann Surg 2000, 231:909-918.
31. Vortmeyer AO, Lubensky IA, Skarulis M, Li G, Moon YW, Park WS, Weil R, Barlow C, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ, Zhuang Z: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: atypical presentation, clinical course, and genetic analysis of multiple tumors. Mod Pathol 1999, 12:919-924.
32. Schaefer S, Shipotko M, Meyer S, Ivan D, Klose KJ, Waldmann J, Langer P, Kann PH: Natural course of small adrenal lesions in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: an endoscopic ultrasound imaging study. Eur J Endocrinol 2008, 158:699-704.
33. Cinman NM, Okeke Z, Smith AD: Pelvic kidney: associated diseases and treatment. J Endourol 2007, 21:836-842.
34. Miralles C, Orea M, España P, Provencio M, Sánchez A, Cantos B, Cubedo R, Carcereny E, Bonilla F, Gea T: Cancer Antigen 125 Associated With Multiple Benign and Malignant Pathologies. Ann Surg Oncol 2003, 10:150-154.
35. 5. Guru SC, Goldsmith PK, Burns AL, Marx SJ, Spiegel AM, Collins FS, Chandrasekharappa SC: Menin, the product of MEN1 gene, is a nuclear protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci 1998, 95:1630-1634.
36. Agarwal SK, Guru SC, Heppner C, Erdos MR, Collins RM, Park SY, Saggar S, Chandrasekharappa SC, Collins FS, Spiegel AM, Marx SJ, Burns AL: Menin interacts with the AP1 transcription factor JunD and represses JunD- activated transcription. Cell 1999, 96:143-152.
37. Lemos MC, Thakker RV: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): analysis of 1336 mutations reported in the first decade following identification of the gene. Hum Mutat 2008, 29:22-32.
doi:10.1186/1477-7819-9-6
Cite this article as: Griniatsos et al .: Bilateral adrenocortical carcinoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and a novel mutation in the MEN1 gene. World Journal of Surgical Oncology 2011 9:6.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:
· Convenient online submission
· Thorough peer review
. No space constraints or color figure charges
· Immediate publication on acceptance
. Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
. Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at www.biomedcentral.com/submit
☐ BioMed Central