[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Guided Therapy in Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma: An Illustrative Case

Introduction

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with high rates of morbidity and mortality. When feasible, complete surgical resection is the most effective therapy for ACC, which yields the best patient survival rates; however, for the many patients who present with advanced disease, the benefits of major surgical intervention are questionable.1 Adjuvant chemotherapy is often used after incomplete surgical resection of primary ACC and in patients with metastatic disease. Although little data has been published about the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for ACC, some patients may benefit from neoadjuvant systemic therapy that can help control distant metastases, reduce the size of primary tumor, and make surgical resection possible.

[18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) is widely used to detect areas of increased glucose uptake, which are associated with malignancy; FDG-PET also provides functional information about glycolytic activity in tumors, including ACC.2,3 FDG-PET has been reported to have a higher sensitivity for distant metastases than computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis, although the two forms of imaging may have complemen- tary roles.4-7 To our knowledge, the use of FDG-PET in patients with ACC to monitor responses to chemotherapy or to help in the planning of surgical interventions has not been described. In this article, we report the case of a patient with metastatic ACC who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection; FDG- PET/CT was instrumental in guiding the treatment plan, including the duration of chemotherapy and the timing and extent of surgery.

Case Report

During the workup for newly diagnosed hypertension, a 38-year- old white man was found to have a mass in the left upper abdominal quadrant on ultrasound imaging. CT of the abdomen confirmed the presence of a 14.7-cm heterogeneous left adrenal mass with a tumor thrombus that extended into the left renal vein, inferior vena cava (IVC), and portal vein, with multiple hepatic metastases, para-aortic lymphadenopathy, and a possible pulmonary metastasis (an axial CT scan of the abdomen, which shows a heterogeneous left adrenal mass [arrow] with a hypodense area in the liver [arrowhead] that were compatible with hepatic metastasis, is presented in Fig 1). Findings from a CT-guided biopsy of the adrenal mass were suggestive of ACC, with a Ki-67 labeling index of 15% (Fig 2; immunohistochemistry staining; original magnification ×200).

The patient was referred to the University of Texas MD Anderson cancer center and reported having stable weight and denied having muscle weakness, striae, palpitations, or other noteworthy com- plaints. There was no family history of cancer. On physical examina- tion, the blood pressure of the patient was 170/97 mmHg, and his

Fig 1.

heart rate was 90 beats per minute. The patient had mild facial pleth- ora with a subtle cushingoid appearance and, on deep palpation, moderate tenderness without rebound or rigidity in the left upper quadrant of the abdomen. Laboratory testing revealed a serum cortisol concentration of of 29 µg/dL and undetectable adrenocorticotropic hormone, which were suggestive of autonomous cortisol production. FDG-PET/CT imaging was done for staging purposes and revealed evidence of an increased uptake in the left adrenal mass with vascular extension and distant metastases (Fig 3A, coronal whole-body FDG-PET shows the left adrenal mass [arrow] with hepatic metastases [arrowheads]; Fig 3B, fused axial PET/CT image shows an increased FDG uptake in the left adrenal mass [white arrow], hepatic metastases [arrowhead], and portal vein thrombus [black arrow]). Because of the presence of distant metastases and intravascular thrombus, neoadjuvant systemic therapy

Fig 2.

Downloaded from ascopubs.org by National Library of Medicine - US on April 4, 2026 from 130.014.025.182

Copyright @ 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Fig 3.

A

B

was selected as the first-line treatment instead of surgery. The chem- otherapy protocol included 28-day cycles of etoposide (100 mg/m2 per day on days 5, 6, and 7), doxorubicin (20 mg/m2 per day on days 1 and 8), and cisplatin (40 mg/m2 per day on days 2 and 9). The patient also

Fig 4.

received concomitant mitotane therapy with a dose that reached 5 g per day and achieved a therapeutic level of 17.4 µg/mL (target, 14 to 21 µg/mL).

After five cycles of chemotherapy, repeat CT imaging revealed a partial response to therapy, per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 (Fig 4; axial CT images postchemotherapy that illustrate the reduced size of the primary adrenal mass [arrow] and liver metastasis [arrowhead]). The primary adrenal mass had de- creased from 14.7 to 9.2 cm in the greatest dimension, he para-aortic lymph node had decreased from 5.9 to 1.9 cm and had features that suggested partial calcification, and hepatic metastases were still visible but smaller. PET/CT imaging performed the next day corroborated the CT evidence and also demonstrated metabolic changes in the tumor consistent with a response to therapy. (Fig 5A, coronal view of whole-body FDG-PET that shows the disappearance of uptake in the adrenal mass and hepatic metastasis; Fig 5B, fused axial PET/CT images that show the resolution of FDG uptake in the primary adrenal mass [white arrow], hepatic metastases, and portal vein thrombus [black arrow]).

Before chemotherapy, the standardized uptake value-lean (SUL) peak was 7.1 in the primary tumor and 2.7 in the left para-aortic lymph node; hepatic metastases were more subtle, with SUL peak measure- ments of 2.1 and 1.9. After therapy, the glucose uptake at all previously identified tumor sites was indistinguishable from background levels, with SUL peak measurements less than two times the mediastinal blood pool activity, which was consistent with a complete meta- bolic response.

On the basis of CT findings alone, the plan would have been to continue systemic chemotherapy; however, in light of the PET/CT findings, it was decided to proceed with surgery. The patient had a left radical nephrectomy with left radical adrenalectomy, IVC thrombec- tomy with IVC repair, and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. The vascular thrombus was adherent to the vascular wall, and a small part (approximately 5%) could not be resected. Resection of the hepatic lesions was not attempted because of the lack of FDG uptake. Patho- logic analysis of the surgical specimen revealed a well-circumscribed tumor, which measured 9.5 X 9.5 X 5.0 cm and weighed 320 g, that occupied the entire adrenal gland. Grossly, the tumor had necrotic areas with evidence of hemorrhage. Microscopically, there were neo- plastic cells present in the primary tumor and renal vein that showed

Fig 5.

A

B

extensive necrosis, with less than 1% viable tumor cells (Fig 6A, extensive necrosis of the tumor; original magnification ×200; Fig 6B, area of tumor with preserved architecture, original magnification ×400; hematoxylin and eosin stain). Immunohistochemistry showed tumor cells positive for inhibin, calretinin, and CD10 and negative for ethidium monoazide and S100; these findings were consistent with an adrenocortical origin for the

A

Fig 6.

B

mass/ tumor. The Ki-67-labeling index in these areas was less than 1% (Fig 7; Ki-67 staining after chemotherapy; original magnification ×400).

To improve the chance of survival of the patient and because of the incomplete resection of the vascular thrombus, we delivered two

Fig 7.

Downloaded from ascopubs.org by National Library of Medicine - US on April 4, 2026 from 130.014.025.182

Copyright @ 2026 American Society of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.

Diagnosis in Oncology

more cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy and continued mitotane ther- apy. Twenty-eight months after diagnosis, the patient remained disease-free. Hepatic lesions had resolved on CT imaging, and repeat PET/CT scans were also negative for abnormal uptake at all sites (not shown).

Discussion

ACC is a rare endocrine malignancy with no data or formal recommendations about the use of FDG-PET/CT in patients with ACC for treatment monitoring.

The increasing use of FDG-PET/CT in oncologic practice allows physicians to obtain greater amounts of both anatomic and functional data about malignant tumors. The widely used RECIST to detect a response to systemic therapy depends mainly on cross-sectional body imaging to demonstrate changes in tumor measurements compared with baseline studies.8 However, these criteria do not include a functional component in the evaluation, which led to the proposal of new criteria (PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors [PERCIST]) that combine functional FDG-PET imaging with cross-sectional body imaging.9

FDG-PET imaging can provide early indications of a response to anticancer treatments.1º Moreover, many studies in a variety of tumor types (including lymphoma, breast cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer) have suggested that metabolic responses on PET imaging are seen earlier than responses on anatomic imaging.11-13 In patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors, reliance on CT imaging alone can underestimate the effect of systemic targeted therapy; in one of five patients, FDG-PET imaging detected a response to imatinib mesylate treatment 2 months earlier than CT alone.14 Similarly, there is a significant correlation between FDG uptake and markers of cell pro- liferation (ie, Ki-67 index and mitotic activity) in a variety of tumors, including gastrointestinal stromal tumors15 and non-small-cell lung cancer.16

In the case presented in this article, PET/CT imaging pre- dicted a greater response to therapy than anatomic imaging had suggested. According to RECIST 1.1, the tumor showed a partial response, with a 51% decrease in the sum of tumor measurements. In contrast, the application of PERCIST determined that the tumor had shown a complete metabolic response. This information indi- cated the effectiveness of the chemotherapy regimen and prompted an earlier surgical resection than would have been indicated by RECIST alone. Pathologic analysis of the surgical specimen sup- ported the PET/CT impression, with large regions of necrosis, little viable tumor, and minimal cell proliferation. This experience sug- gested that FDG-PET/CT can assess the effectiveness of systemic chemotherapy for ACC and help surgical planning in patients with ACC. Future studies are needed to validate these observations and determine whether changes in FDG uptake can also predict long-term outcome and survival in patients with ACC as it can in patient with other malignancies.17

Hubert H. Chuang, Ferhat Deniz, Kanishka Sircar, and Camilo Jimenez

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

Carlos Rubin De Celis

Texas Oncology, Austin, TX

Christopher G. Wood and Mouhammed Amir Habra The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Supported in part by Grant No. CA016672 from the National Institutes of Health through the MD Anderson Cancer Center.

AUTHORS’ DISCLOSURES OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The author(s) indicated no potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

1. Dackiw AP, Lee JE, Gagel RF, et al: Adrenal cortical carcinoma. World J Surg 25:914-926, 2001

2. Delbeke D: Oncological applications of FDG PET imaging. J Nucl Med 40:1706-1715, 1999

3. Maurea S, Mainolfi C, Bazzicalupo L, et al: Imaging of adrenal tumors using FDG PET: Comparison of benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:25-29, 1999

4. Boland GW, Goldberg MA, Lee MJ, et al: Indeterminate adrenal mass in patients with cancer: Evaluation at PET with 2-[F-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. Radiology 194:131-134, 1995

5. Erasmus JJ, Patz EF Jr, McAdams HP, et al: Evaluation of adrenal masses in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 168:1357-1360, 1997

6. Leboulleux S, Dromain C, Bonniaud G, et al: Diagnostic and prognostic value of 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in adrenocortical carcinoma: A prospective comparison with computed tomography. J Clin Endo- crinol Metab 91:920-925, 2006

7. Antoch G, Saoudi N, Kuehl H, et al: Accuracy of whole-body dual-modality fluorine-18-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and com- puted tomography (FDG-PET/CT) for tumor staging in solid tumors: comparison with CT and PET. J Clin Oncol 22:4357-4368, 2004

8. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al: New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45:228-247, 2009

9. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, et al: From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 50:122S- 150S, 2009 (suppl 1)

10. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, et al: Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emis- sion tomography: Review and 1999 EORTC recommendations-European Orga- nization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer 35:1773-1782, 1999

11. Wahl RL, Zasadny K, Helvie M, et al: Metabolic monitoring of breast cancer chemohormonotherapy using positron emission tomography: Initial evaluation. J Clin Oncol 11:2101-2111, 1993

12. Mikhaeel NG, Timothy AR, O’Doherty MJ, et al: 18-FDG-PET as a prog- nostic indicator in the treatment of aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma- comparison with CT. Leuk Lymphoma 39:543-553, 2000

13. Lee DH, Kim SK, Lee HY, et al: Early prediction of response to first-line therapy using integrated 18F-FDG PET/CT for patients with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4:816-821, 2009

14. Gayed I, Vu T, Iyer R, et al: The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors. J Nucl Med 45:17-21, 2004

15. Kamiyama Y, Aihara R, Nakabayashi T, et al: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: Useful technique for predicting malignant poten- tial of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. World J Surg 29:1429-1435, 2005

16. Vesselle H, Salskov A, Turcotte E, et al: Relationship between non-small cell lung cancer FDG uptake at PET, tumor histology, and Ki-67 proliferation index. J Thorac Oncol 3:971-978, 2008

17. Mikhaeel NG, Hutchings M, Fields PA, et al: FDG-PET after two to three cycles of chemotherapy predicts progression-free and overall survival in high- grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Oncol 16:1514-1523, 2005

DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.40.6710; published online ahead of print at www.jco.org on May 29, 2012