CrossMark
REVIEW
5th International ACC Symposium: An Outlook to Current and Future Research on the Biology of Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications
Enzo Lalli1,2,3 . Hironobu Sasano 4
Received: 30 October 2015 / Accepted: 1 December 2015 /Published online: 14 December 2015 C Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 ☐
Abstract Groundbreaking progress has been recently made in elucidating the signaling pathways that are altered in adre- nocortical carcinoma (ACC), an endocrine malignancy that still has an unfavorable prognosis, and in understanding its genomic structure. These advances need now to be translated to create cellular and animal models more relevant to human disease in order to develop new and more effective diagnostic procedures and targeted therapies against this deadly malignancy.
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malig- nancy with a poor prognosis. Surgery could be curative in the great majority of cases with localized disease, but ACC often relapses or is already metastatic at the time of diagnosis. In those cases, therapeutic options are limited to the use of mitotane, an adrenolytic drug whose introduction in ACC treatment dates back to 1960s, that can be associated to sys- temic chemotherapy [1, 2]. However, therapeutic results have
5th International ACC Symposium Session: Closing the Gap at the Bench: Molecules to Organisms
☒ Enzo Lalli ninino@ipmc.cnrs.fr
☒ Hironobu Sasano hsasano@patholo2.med.tohoku.ac.jp
1 Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire CNRS, 660 route des Lucioles, 06560 Valbonne, France
2 NEOGENEX CNRS International Associated Laboratory, Valbonne, France
3 Université de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, Nice, France
4 Department of Pathology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai 980-8575, Japan
generally remained poor and a consensus exists about the urgent need for novel drugs that are more efficient to fight against this deadly malignancy. A steadily increasing number of laboratories worldwide is therefore actively engaged in ba- sic and translational research to develop better therapies for ACC. A critical element for those developments consists in a better understanding of the biology of ACC, and in particular of the molecular mechanisms that regulate its growth and spread, through approaches that include the identification of new biomarkers for disease diagnosis and relapse, the gener- ation of new cell and animal models and the preclinical testing of new therapies. The last session (Closing the gap at the bench: molecules to organisms) at the recent 5th International Adrenal Cancer Symposium (Ann Arbor MI, October 14-15, 2015) provided a unique opportunity for both basic scientists and clinicians to discuss the latest developments in the field. Here, we will make a brief discussion of the presentations in Ann Arbor trying to put them in the context of current research in the domain of ACC biology.
New Biomarkers for ACC
MicroRNA (miRNA) is a class of evolutionarily conserved, small non-coding eukaryotic RNA molecules which regulate gene expression at the level of translation. They are implicated in virtually every biological process and also have a relevant role in tumorigenesis. Several studies have reported that a distinct microRNA expression signature can differentiate ACC from adrenocortical benign tumors. In addition, the ex- pression levels of specific miRNAs in the tumor are prognos- tic markers reviewed in [3]. Recent studies have revealed that circulating miRNAs may represent potential biomarkers of malignancy in ACC patients [4-6]. However, further studies on larger cohorts are needed to precisely assess their
diagnostic and prognostic role, in particular to monitor tumor recurrence. A new twist in the field of miRNA is their poten- tial use as therapeutic tools. At the Ann Arbor meeting, Dr. Stan Sidhu (University of Sydney, Australia) presented results of a recently published study from his group showing that miR-7, which has a tumor suppressor role in ACC, can reduce growth of H295R and primary ACC cells xenografts when administered in the form of targeted, clinically safe delivery vesicles (nanocells) [7].
Another promising area of research is the study of circulat- ing tumor cells (CTCs) in ACC patients. CTCs are neoplastic cells originating from either the primary tumor or metastases, which can be detected and isolated in the peripheral blood of cancer patients. CTCs are a reliable tool for prognosis and follow-up in several solid human malignancies [8]. A prelim- inary study has revealed that CTCs are present in the circula- tion of ACC patients but not in patients with benign adreno- cortical tumors. In addition, a significant decrease in the num- ber of CTCs has been reported following surgery compared to presurgical samples [9]. CTCs isolation may allow to obtain a “liquid biopsy” of ACC, which could be especially useful to monitor the occurrence of relapses and to study the evolution of ACC genomes during disease progression or chemothera- peutic treatments. Other approaches that may provide in the near future minimally invasive access to ACC genetic infor- mation for diagnostic and prognostic purposes include the study of cell-free DNA and exosomes in the bloodstream [10], while differential analysis of the urinary steroid metabo- lome may help to distinguish malignant from benign adrenal tumors [11, 12].
Cellular Models for ACC
Compared to most other malignancies, one serious shortcom- ing of ACC is the availability of virtually only one differenti- ated human adrenocortical cell line, the NCI-H295 and its derivatives reviewed in [13]. Another human cell line (SW- 13), which has been used in several studies as a model for ACC, lacks expression of adrenocortical markers and does not produce steroids [13, 14]. Therefore, its usefulness as an ACC model cell line is highly questionable. As an additional tool, the SJ-ACC3 human adrenocortical cell line has been established from a pediatric tumor. This cell line only grows as subcutaneous xenografts in immunodeficient mice [15]. More recently, another pediatric cell line growing as xeno- grafts has been established in the same laboratory from a dif- ferent patient (G. Zambetti, personal communication). At the Ann Arbor meeting, Dr. Constanze Hantel (University of Mu- nich, Germany) described a new human adrenocortical xeno- graft model (MUC-1), also growing as a cell line, established in her laboratory from a neck metastasis of an adult ACC. These new ACC cell lines will be very important in the near
future to expand and diversify the studies on adrenocortical cells beyond the NCI-H295 model.
Animal Models for ACC
A few animal models have been reported for ACC. Some of them exploit injection of adrenocortical cell lines (most commonly NCI-H295) in immunodeficient mice, while others are derived from genetically modified animals.
- Xenograft models: the first report of a subcutaneous xe- nograft animal model for ACC dates back to 2000 [16]. Since that time, numerous studies have used this model to monitor its sensitivity to different drug treatments reviewed in [17]. A major drawback of this model is the absence of the capacity to metastasize, which is in sharp contrast to human ACC. This renders the subcutaneous xenograft model not convenient for studies aimed at in- vestigation of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of metastasis formation in ACC and to test therapies for metastatic disease. An orthotopic model of ACC consisting in normal bovine adrenocortical cells im- planted under the renal capsule of immunodeficient mice has also been described. Genetic modification of those cells with an oncogenic version of Ras and a dominant- negative p53 induced malignant tumor formation with local dissemination [18]. Possibilities to boost the meta- static capacities of adrenocortical cells in future studies may include the use of new administration routes (intra- venous, etc.) and the modulation of the expression of endogenous factors (adhesion molecules, cytokines, etc.) favoring metastasis formation.
- Genetic models: genetic models of adrenocortical neopla- sia have been described, but in general, they exhibit only limited malignant character.
a) Gonadectomy can induce neoplasia in the adrenal cortex of the domestic ferret and in some strains of mice, as well as in some lines of genetically modified mice in a non- neoplasia-prone background reviewed in [19]. Transgenic mice harboring multiple copies of the Sf-1 (Nr5a1) gene also develop adrenocortical neoplasia in the absence of gonadectomy [20]. The common features of those models are proliferation of neoplastic cells in a subcapsular loca- tion in the adrenal expressing gonadal markers, most probably derived from undifferentiated adrenogonadal progenitors [21] and little tendency to spread beyond the locoregional location.
b) Other genetic models of adrenocortical neoplasia are based on genes and signaling pathways that are altered in ACC.
Wnt/ß-Catenin
A seminal study by Tissier et al. first showed that activation of the Wnt/ß-catenin signaling pathway is a hallmark of both benign and malignant adrenocortical tumors [22]. Further ge- nomic studies have confirmed that gene mutations that have the consequence to activate this pathway are encountered at high frequency both in adult [23] and children [24] adreno- cortical tumors. Remarkably, the gene most frequently mutat- ed or deleted in adult ACC is ZNRF3, encoding a E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase that acts as a negative regulator of the Wnt signaling pathway by mediating the ubiquitination and degradation of the Wnt receptor complex components Frizzled and LRP6. Studies in various mouse models have shown that ß-catenin activation in the adrenal has relatively weak oncogenic effects, even when combined with overex- pression of the IGF2 growth factor [25-27], suggesting the requirement of further genetic hits for tumor development. Based on the results in human ACC, it will be interesting to study the effect of mouse Znrf3 inactivation on adrenocortical tumor development. However, ß-catenin antagonism either by drugs [28] or by RNA interference [29, 30] is able to significantly decrease ACC cell proliferation in vitro and their growth as xenografts. Those data suggest that counteracting B-catenin activity in ACC could be a promising therapeutic strategy to be assessed by future studies. However, it will very important to tailor the choice of Wnt pathway inhibitors, targeting with drugs either upstream components (porcupine and tankyrase inhibitors) or downstream effectors (CBP, p300) of the pathway [31], according to the specific genetic alterations present in the individual patient with ACC.
TP53
Germline mutations in the tumor suppressor TP53 gene are associated with Li-Fraumeni syndrome, a multiple tumor syn- drome one of whose hallmarks is the high frequency of adre- nocortical tumors [32]. On the other side, adrenocortical tu- mors in children are often associated with germline TP53 mu- tations in the absence of other neoplasms [33, 34]. A peculiar epidemiological situation is present in southern Brazil, where the R337H TP53 mutation is present at a very high frequency (0.3 %) in the population and is associated with adrenocortical tumors in children with low penetrance [35, 36]. Conversely, TP53 germline mutations are uncommonly found in patients diagnosed with ACC as adults [37, 38] but somatic alterations in the p53/Rb pathway were identified in about 30 % of adult ACC [23]. This pathway then appears to represent a major driver of oncogenic transformation in ACC, similarly to many other malignancies. A new transgenic mouse model was pre- sented at the Ann Arbor meeting by Dr. Pierre Val (University of Clermont, Clermont-Ferrand, France) where expression the SV40 T antigen, which binds to and inactivates both the p53
and the Rb tumor suppressor proteins, was targeted to the adrenal cortex under the control of the Akr1b7 promoter ([39] and A.M. Lefrançois-Martinez, personal communica- tion). Adrenal T transgenic mice develop adrenocortical car- cinomas that metastasize with high frequency and will provide a very useful model to test novel therapies against metastatic ACC. Studies are also in progress in Dr. Gerard Zambetti’s laboratory (St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis TN, USA) to characterize the phenotype of mice bearing the targeted R334H Tp53 mutation, homologous to human R337H (G. Zambetti, personal communication).
Novel Drugs and Strategies for ACC Treatment
The recent conspicuous advances in our understanding of ACC biology have led to the proposal of a series of new therapies targeting some among the major actors in ACC path- ogenesis; see [40-42] for review. However, for the moment, novel drugs have not gone beyond the preclinical stage of investigation or have produced unsatisfactory results when introduced in the clinic. This has been the case for IGF-1R inhibitors, whose trial in ACC patients was based on promis- ing preclinical data [43, 44]. However, a clinical trial with the orally available IGF-1R inhibitor linsitinib (OSI-906) did not show positive effects of the drug on overall or progression- free survival in ACC patients [45]. Several elements can be invoked to account for those disappointing results:
- The trial involved patients with advanced disease who already received intense chemotherapeutic treatment.
- Since a partial response was observed in a small group of patients in that study, the identification of predictive bio- markers may help to identify patients that will benefit from IGF-1R inhibitors therapy.
- Other drugs may need to be associated to IGF-1R inhib- itors to completely block downstream signaling pathways regulating proliferation and apoptosis of ACC cells. An- other study in fact observed disease stabilization in ACC patients treated with a combination of the IGF-1R anti- body cixutumumab and the mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus [46].
Recent studies suggest that the SOAT1 (Sterol-O-Acetyl Transferase 1) enzyme is a novel emerging therapeutic target in ACC. In Ann Arbor, Dr. Matthias Kroiss (University of Würzburg, Germany) presented the results of a groundbreak- ing study from his group that for the first time identified a molecular target for mitotane. Mitotane was found to inhibit SOAT1, causing accumulation of free cholesterol, oxysterols and fatty acids inside adrenocortical cells, induction of ER stress and, ultimately, cell death. The study by the Würzburg team has also shown that SOAT1 expression levels are
variable in ACC, being low or absent in about one third of cases [47]. This provides a rationale to screen patients with ACC for SOAT1 expression in their tumor to predict their response to mitotane. In another session of the symposium, Dr. Gary Hammer presented data showing the efficacy of ATR-101, a new orally available SOAT1 inhibitor, in preclin- ical models of ACC. A phase I clinical trial for safety and tolerability of ATR-101 is currently ongoing (https:// clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01898715).
Conclusion
The recent great advances in our understanding of ACC biol- ogy need now to be translated to create cellular and animal models that are closer to the human disease in order to develop new, more effective diagnostic procedures and targeted thera- pies against this deadly neoplasm. Close collaboration be- tween basic scientists and clinicians as well as maintenance and further expansion of international ACC patients registries is considered essential for the success of this endeavor.
Acknowledgments We thank the speakers of the session “Closing the gap at the bench: molecules to organisms” at the Ann Arbor meeting, Gerard Zambetti and Anne-Marie Lefrançois-Martinez, for allowing us to cite their unpublished results before publication. Matthias Kroiss is also thanked for critical reading of the manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
References
1. Terzolo M, Angeli A, Fassnacht M et al (2007) Adjuvant mitotane treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma. N Eng J Med 356:2372-2380
2. Fassnacht M, Terzolo M, Allolio B et al (2012) Combination che- motherapy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. N Eng J Med 366:2189-2197
3. Singh P, Soon PSH, Feige J-J et al (2012) Dysregulation of microRNAs in adrenocortical tumors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 351: 118-128
4. Chabre O, Libé R, Assie G et al (2013) Serum miR-483-5p and miR-195 are predictive of recurrence risk in adrenocortical cancer patients. Endocr Relat Cancer 20:579-594
5. Patel D, Boufragech M, Jain M et al (2013) MiR-34a and miR-483- 5p are candidate serum biomarkers for adrenocortical tumors. Surgery 154:1224-1228
6. Szabó DR, Luconi M, Szabó PM et al (2014) Analysis of circulat- ing microRNAs in adrenocortical tumors. Lab Invest 94:331-339
7. Glover AR, Zhao JT, Gill AJ et al. (2015) microRNA-7 as a tumor suppressor and novel therapeutic for adrenocortical carcinoma. Oncotarget
8. Sun YF, Yang XR, Zhou J et al (2011) Circulating tumor cells: advances in detection methods, biological issues, and clinical rele- vance. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 137:1151-1173
9. Pinzani P, Scatena C, Salvianti F et al (2013) Detection of circulat- ing tumor cells in patients with adrenocortical carcinoma: a monocentric preliminary study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: 3731-3738
10. Cai X, Janku F, Zhan Q et al (2015) Accessing genetic information with liquid biopsies. Trends Genet 31:564-575
11. 1. Arlt W, Biehl M, Taylor AE et al (2011) Urine steroid metabolomics as a biomarker tool for detecting malignancy in adrenal tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:3775-3784
12. Kerkhofs TM, Kerstens MN, Kema IP et al (2015) Diagnostic value of urinary steroid profiling in the evaluation of adrenal tumors. Horm Cancer 6:168-175
13. Wang T, Rainey WE (2012) Human adrenocortical carcinoma cell lines. Mol Cell Endocrinol 351:58-65
14. Doghman M, Cazareth J, Douguet D et al (2009) Inhibition of adrenocortical carcinoma cell proliferation by steroidogenic factor-1 inverse agonists. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:2178-2183
15. Pinto EM, Morton C, Rodriguez-Galindo C et al (2013) Establishment and characterization of the first pediatric adrenocor- tical carcinoma xenograft model identifies topotecan as a potential chemotherapeutic agent. Clin Cancer Res 19:1740-1747
16. Logié A, Boudou P, Boccon-Gibod L et al (2000) Establishment and characterization of a human adrenocortical carcinoma xeno- graft model. Endocrinology 141:3165-3171
17. Hantel C, Beuschlein F (2015) Xenograft models for adrenocortical carcinoma. Mol Cell Endocrinol
18. Herbet M, Salomon A, Feige JJ et al (2012) Acquisition order of Ras and p53 gene alterations defines distinct adrenocortical tumor phenotypes. PLoS Genet 8:e1002700
19. Bielinska M, Kiiveri S, Parviainen H et al (2006) Gonadectomy- induced adrenocortical neoplasia in the domestic ferret (Mustela putorius furo) and laboratory mouse. Vet Pathol 43:97-117
20. Doghman M, Karpova T, Rodrigues GA et al (2007) Increased steroidogenic factor-1 dosage triggers adrenocortical cell prolifera- tion and cancer. Mol Endocrinol 21:2968-2987
21. Looyenga BD, Hammer GD (2006) Origin and identity of adreno- cortical tumors in inhibin knockout mice: implications for cellular plasticity in the adrenal cortex. Mol Endocrinol 20:2848-2863
22. Tissier F, Cavard C, Groussin L et al (2005) Mutations of ß-catenin in adrenocortical tumors: activation of the Wnt signaling pathway is a frequent event in both benign and malignant adrenocortical tu- mors. Cancer Res 65:7622-7627
23. Assié G, Letouzé E, Fassnacht M et al (2014) Integrated genomic characterization of adrenocortical carcinoma. Nat Genet 46:607-612
24. Pinto EM, Chen X, Easton J et al (2015) Genomic landscape of paediatric adrenocortical tumours. Nat Comm 6:6302
25. Berthon A, Sahut-Barnola I, Lambert-Langlais S et al (2010) Constitutive beta-catenin activation induces adrenal hyperplasia and promotes adrenal cancer development. Hum Mol Genet 19: 1561-1576
26. Heaton JH, Wood MA, Kim AC et al (2012) Progression to adre- nocortical tumorigenesis in mice and humans through insulin-like growth factor 2 and ß-catenin. Am J Pathol 181:1017-1033
27. Drelon C, Berthon A, Ragazzon B et al (2012) Analysis of the role of Igf2 in adrenal tumour development in transgenic mouse models. PLoS One 7:e44171
28. Doghman M, Cazareth J, Lalli E (2008) The T cell factor/beta- catenin antagonist PKF115-584 inhibits proliferation of adrenocor- tical carcinoma cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:3222-3225
29. Gaujoux S, Hantel C, Launay P et al (2013) Silencing mutated ß- catenin inhibits cell proliferation and stimulates apoptosis in the adrenocortical cancer cell line H295R. PLoS One 8:e55743
30. Salomon A, Keramidas M, Maisin C et al (2015) Loss of ß-catenin in adrenocortical cancer cells causes growth inhibition and reversal of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Oncotarget 6:11421- 11433
31. Kahn M (2014) Can we safely target the WNT pathway? Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:513-532
32. Wagner J, Portwine C, Rabin K et al (1994) High frequency of germline p53 mutations in childhood adrenocortical cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:1707-1710
33. Varley JM, McGown G, Thorncroft M et al (1999) Are there low- penetrance TP53 alleles? Evidence from childhood adrenocortical tumors. Am J Hum Genet 65:995-1006
34. Wasserman JD, Novokmet A, Eichler-Jonsson C et al (2015) Prevalence and functional consequence of TP53 mutations in pedi- atric adrenocortical carcinoma: a children’s oncology group study. J Clin Oncol 33:602-609
35. Ribeiro RC, Sandrini F, Figueiredo B et al (2001) An inherited p53 mutation that contributes in a tissue-specific manner to pediatric ad- renal cortical carcinoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9330-9335
36. Custódio G, Parise GA, Kiesel FN et al (2013) Impact of neonatal screening and surveillance for the TP53 R337H mutation on early detection of childhood adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Oncol 31: 2619-2626
37. Herrmann LJM, Heinze B, Fassnacht M et al (2012) TP53 germline mutations in adult patients with adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:E476-E485
38. Raymond VM, Else T, Everett JN et al (2013) Prevalence of germline TP53 mutations in a prospective series of unselected pa- tients with adrenocortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98: E119-E125
39. Ragazzon B, Lefrançois-Martinez AM, Val P et al (2006) Adrenocorticotropin-dependent changes in SF-1/DAX-1 ratio in- fluence steroidogenic genes expression in a novel model of glucocorticoid-producing adrenocortical cell lines derived from targeted tumorigenesis. Endocrinology 147:1805-1818
40. Maluf DF, de Oliveira BH, Lalli E (2011) Therapy of adrenocortical cancer: present and future. Am J Cancer Res 1:222-232
41. Kerkhofs TMA, Ettaieb MHT, Hermsen IGC et al (2015) Developing treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer 22:R325-R338
42. Creemers SG, Hofland L, Korpershoek E et al. (2015) Future di- rections in the diagnosis and medical treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma. Endocr Relat Cancer
43. Almeida MQ, Fragoso MCBV, Lotfi CFP et al (2008) Expression of insulin-like growth factor-II and its receptor in pediatric and adult adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:3524-3531
44. Barlaskar F, Spalding AC, Heaton JH et al (2009) Preclinical targeting of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor in adreno- cortical carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:204-212
45. Fassnacht M, Berruti A, Baudin E et al (2015) Linsitinib (OSI-906) versus placebo for patients with locally advanced or metastatic ad- renocortical carcinoma: a double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 16:426-435
46. Naing A, Lorusso P, Fu S et al (2013) Insulin growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) antibody cixutumumab combined with the mTOR inhib- itor temsirolimus in patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcino- ma. Br J Cancer 108:826-830
47. Sbiera S, Leich E, Liebisch G et al (2015) Mitotane inhibits Sterol- O-Acyl transferase 1 triggering lipid-mediated endoplasmic reticu- lum stress and apoptosis in adrenocortical carcinoma cells. Endocrinology 156:3895-3908