A Surgical Approach to Adrenocortical Tumors in Children: The Mainstay of Treatment
By Jessica N. Stewart, Helene Flageole, and Petr Kavan Montreal, Quebec
Background: Adrenocortical tumors (ACTs) are rare in the pediatric population. The pathogenesis, prognostic indica- tors, and management of these tumors are still unclear because of its infrequent occurrence. This case series pre- sents the surgical experience of the authors’ center over 29 years.
Methods: The medical records of children treated for ACTs between 1974 and 2003 were reviewed. Information on age, sex, presenting symptoms, hormonal levels, pathology, stage, treatment, and outcome was obtained.
Results: Nine children (5 girls, 4 boys) were treated for ACTs. The median age at presentation was 29 months (range, 5 months to 11 years). Endocrine dysfunction was found in 8 patients. Four presented with virilizing symptoms, 4 pre- sented with both virilizing and Cushing’s symptoms, and 1 patient with Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome was identified during routine screening. One was an adenoma, and 8 were carcinomas. Of the carcinomas, 3 were stage I, and 5 were stage II. The mean tumor weight was 125 g (range, 42 g to
336 g) with a mean volume of 139 cm3 (range, 30 cm3 to 626 cm3). All patients had complete excision of the tumor with spillage occurring in 2 cases. Lymph node biopsies were done in all but 2 patients. Two patients were treated with chemotherapy because of large tumor size and nodal in- volvement. All patients are doing well including those with tumor spillage.
Conclusions: This study shows that surgical excision contin- ues to be the mainstay of treatment for ACTs. Extensive lymph node biopsy in small ACTs can probably be avoided given the generally good outcome with surgery alone. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear because most of the children in our series were effectively treated with surgi- cal resection only. Patients should be enrolled in multicenter trials to assess the added value of chemotherapy.
J Pediatr Surg 39:759-763. @ 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
INDEX WORDS: Adrenal carcinoma, adrenal adenoma, child- hood adrenocortical tumor.
B OTH ADRENOCORTICAL adenomas and carcino- mas are considered in the literature under the heading of adrenocortical tumors. It often is difficult to distinguish between these 2 entities based on histopatho- logic features alone.1 These tumors are rare in the pedi- atric population, comprising less than 0.2% of all pedi- atric neoplasms and 6% of all pediatric adrenal tumors.2 The incidence of this disease varies depending on geo- graphic location with one region of Brazil having the highest frequency.3 Malignant adrenocortical tumors are thought to have a poor prognosis in both adults and children.4 These tumors are more likely to be functional in children presenting with symptoms caused by in- creased levels of adrenal hormones. The heterogeneous nature and infrequency of this tumor have made it diffi- cult to identify clear prognostic factors.5 Surgical resec- tion plays an important role in the treatment of adreno- cortical tumors. The added benefit of chemotherapeutic agents remains unclear given the low incidence of this malignancy.6 The goal of this study is to describe the presentation, management, and long-term outcome of patients who presented with adrenocortical tumors in our institution. In particular, the focus was on assessing the effectiveness of surgical excision and the need for lymph node biopsy in all patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The records of all children with adrenocortical tumors treated at the Montreal Children’s Hospital between 1974 and 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 9 children presented during this 29-year period. Information recorded for each patient included age, sex, pre- senting symptoms, diagnostic features, hormonal status, pathologic findings, stage of disease, treatment, and outcome. The tumors were classified as adrenocortical adenomas or carcinomas using previously reported classification schemes.7-9 The tumors were staged according to the system initially proposed by Sandrini et al6 and modified to put more emphasis on tumor weight (Table 1).
RESULTS
Five girls and 4 boys were treated for adrenocortical tumors within this period. The median age at presenta- tion was 29 months (range, 5 months to 11 years). Eight
From the Divisions of Pediatric Surgery and Pediatric Oncology, the Montreal Children’s Hospital of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Presented at the 35th Annual Meeting of the Canadian Association of Paediatric Surgeons, Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada, Sep- tember 18-21, 2003.
Address reprint requests to Petr Kavan, MD, PhD, Montreal Chil- dren’s Hospital, 2300 Tupper, Suite C-1129, Montreal, Quebec, Can- ada, H3H 1P3.
C 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 0022-3468/04/3905-0021$30.00/0
doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2004.01.029
| Stage | Description |
|---|---|
| Stage I | . Complete surgical resection · Tumor <100 g or <200 cm3 · Absence of metastasis . Normal hormone levels postoperatively |
| Stage II | . Microscopic residual tumor . Tumor >100 g or >200 cm3 . Tumor spillage during surgery . Abnormal hormone levels postoperatively |
| Stage III Stage IV | . Gross residual or inoperable primary tumor · Metastatic disease |
patients showed signs of endocrine dysfunction. Four patients presented with virilizing symptoms alone. The other 4 had a mix of virilizing and Cushingoid symp- toms. Symptoms of virilization include hirsutism, growth of pubic hair, acne, voice changes, clitoromegaly, and penile enlargement. The most common Cushingoid symptoms seen were hypertension, central obesity, buf- falo hump, and a moon face. Patient 3 also had an abdominal mass on presentation. One patient with Beck- with-Wiedemann syndrome was identified during imag- ing done for screening purposes. The average duration of symptoms was 6 months (range, 2 to 12 months). The hormonal levels correlated with the clinical profile in all patients. Diagnosis of adrenal tumor was made using ultrasound imaging and computed tomography (CT) scan.
All neoplasms were unilateral, with 6 presenting on the left side and 3 on the right side. All patients under- went resection of the tumor, with spillage occurring in 2 patients. The mean tumor weight was 125 g (range, 42 g
to 336 g) with a mean volume of 139 cm3 (range, 30 cm3 to 626 cm3). Lymph node biopsies were done in all but 2 patients, with positive findings in 2 patients. One was a patient with a large tumor size (336 g). The other was found in a patient with a relatively small primary tumor (70.2 g).
One patient was found to have an adrenocortical ade- noma. Three patients had stage I carcinomas, and 5 patients had stage II carcinomas. Hormonal levels re- turned to normal postoperatively in all patients. In the last 2 years, we had 2 patients whose tumors were classified as stage II because of tumor size. However, they also had positive lymph nodes. These patients un- derwent a radical retroperitoneal lymph node dissection based of the belief that local control is important, and the role of chemotherapy is unclear at this time (Raul Ri- beiro, personal communication). These 2 patients also received cisplatin and etoposide for a total of 8 cycles based on the protocol utilized at St Jude Children’s Research Hospital in Memphis.
All of our patients are alive with no recurrence of disease. One of the patients who received chemotherapy completed treatment more than 1 year ago, and the other patient just finished recently. The mean length of fol- low-up is 5.3 years, with a range of 6 months to 11 years. Table 2 details patient demographics.
DISCUSSION
The current study confirms the literature findings with regard to the epidemiology of adrenocortical tumors. In a review of 520 cases, Ribeiro et al5 found that the median age at diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors in the pediatric
| Patient No | Age at Diagnosis (yr) | Sex | Duration of Symptoms (mo) | Clinical Presentation | Tumor Size and Weight | Diagnosis | Treatment | Follow-Up |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.6 | M | 2 | Virilization, Cushing | 137cm3 70.2g | AC Stage II + Lymph node + Spillage | Surgery + chemotherapy | 6 mo |
| 2 | 1 | F | 9 | Virilization, Cushing, abdominal mass | 626cm3 336 g | AC Stage II + Lymph node | Surgery + chemotherapy | 2 yr |
| 3 | 1 | F | 3 | Virilization, Cushing | 113cm3 60.2g | AC Stage II + Spillage | Surgery | 6 mo |
| 4 | 11 | F | 12 | Virilization | 277cm3 105.5g | AC Stage II | Surgery | 3 yr |
| 5 | 1.6 | M | 4-6 | Virilization | 320cm3 219 g | AC Stage II | Surgery | 10 yr |
| 6 | 2.4 | M | 8 | Virilization | 53cm3 43 g | AD | Surgery | 11 yr |
| 7 | 1.5 | F | 3-4 | Virilization, Cushing | 65cm3 42 g | AC Stage I | Surgery | 7 yr |
| 8 | 2 | M | 0 | Asymptomatic (screening) | 30cm3 - | AC Stage I | Surgery | 4 yr |
| 9 | 1.6 | F | 2 | Virilization | 31.5cm3 - | AC Stage I | Surgery | 10 yr |
Abbreviations: AC, Adrenocortical carcinoma; AD, adrenocortical adenoma.
population was 3 years, with less than 10% of tumors presenting in patients 15 years or older. In our study, 8 of the 9 patients were less than 3 years of age. Adrenocor- tical tumors are more common in girls than in boys with a 2.5:1 female to male ratio.10 In our study, there was a slight female predominance.
Predisposing genetic factors can be found in certain patients with adrenocortical tumors. Two syndromes in particular have a clear association with this type of tumor. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is associated with muta- tions of the p53 gene. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome is associated with mutations in the 11p15 region.10 One patient in our series had Beckwith-Wiedeman syndrome. His tumor was identified during imaging done for screen- ing purposes. The presence of p53 mutations was not looked at in our patients.
Unlike in the adult population, most adrenocortical tumors in children are hormonally active.1 All of our patients except for one presented with evidence of a hormonally active tumor. It may be postulated that the patient with Beckwith-Wiedeman might have had symp- toms had his tumor not been detected early by routine screening. The presenting symptoms vary depending on the specific hormones secreted by the tumor. This may lead to a wide range of presenting signs and symptoms. Other studies have shown that 80% to 90% of patients present with virilizing features, either alone or in com- bination with Cushingoid features.5,6,11 Isolated hypera- drenocorticalism was present in only 8% of patients.5 Aldosterone- and estrogen-secreting tumors are rare in children.9,12 The presentation of our patients is consistent with these literature findings, with the overwhelming majority of patients presenting with a virilizing syn- drome, either alone or in combination with Cushing’s syndrome. None of our patients had increased cortisol level in isolation. One patient had increased levels of estrogen as well as increased cortisol and androgens.
The diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors is based on clinical findings, biochemical abnormalities, and radio- logic imaging. Laboratory tests are done to measure levels of hormones secreted by the tumor. These are useful both for diagnostic purposes and for follow-up. Various imaging modalities have been used in the past to establish the diagnosis of adrenocortical tumors. Cur- rently, CT and ultrasound scans are the principal diag- nostic modalities used. CT scan has been shown to be more sensitive than ultrasonography in tumor identifica- tion and localization. In one series of 28 patients, ultra- sound scan did not identify the mass in 11% of cases.6 However, ultrasound scan is useful to evaluate tumor extension into the inferior vena cava and right atrium.5 In our series of patients, ultrasound imaging was done in 6 patients with identification of all 6 tumors. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is also being used increas-
ingly, although its benefit over CT scan remains to be determined. MRI can be used to differentiate between adrenal adenomas and carcinomas, although this distinc- tion can be difficult in some cases.13 On MRI, adenomas usually have a higher fat content than carcinomas. As well, the entire lesion in adenomas loses signal on opposed-phase T1 images compared with carcinomas, in which only a portion of the lesion shows a signal loss.14
Surgical treatment has long been the cornerstone of therapy for adrenocortical tumors. It is the only therapy that unquestionably cures or prolongs survival signifi- cantly.15 It is important to remember that these patients need perioperative steroid coverage. All of our patients underwent complete surgical resection, which was com- plicated by spillage in 2 of our patients. In one study, tumor friability led to rupture of the capsule and tumor spillage in 20% of cases.6 The need for lymph node biopsy for staging and for prognosis has not been ad- dressed clearly in the literature. In our patient series, lymph node biopsy was done in all but 2 patients with positive nodes found in 2 patients. One patient had a large primary tumor (336 g) with extensive nodal in- volvement. The other patient had a fairly small tumor (70.2 g). The former patient currently is free of disease; however, given his relatively recent diagnosis, his long- term outcome remains to be seen.
According to the experience at St Jude (R. Ribiero, personal communication), the presence of positive lymph nodes portends a poor prognosis, and the recommenda- tion is to widely sample the lymph nodes at the time of primary tumor excision and to proceed with radical lymph node dissection (RLND) when the biopsy result is positive. The last 2 patients we had with positive nodes have been treated in this manner.
Other adjunctive therapeutic modalities have been tried in the treatment of adrenocortical tumors. Radio- therapy was shown to have limited success in one study.16 Given the relatively small number of patients with such tumors, the optimal use of chemotherapy has yet to be determined. Mitotane, an insecticide derivative that causes adrenocortical necrosis, has been used in adults, but its efficacy in children has not been well studied.
This drug has significant toxicity, affecting mostly the gastrointestinal and neurological systems. After its use, steroid markers in the blood cannot be followed as an indication of tumor relapse because mitotane interferes with steroid metabolism. A response rate of 30% to 38% has been shown in a few small studies, although these results have not been consistent.16-18 Chemotherapy with combinations of other agents has been tried. A combi- nation of etoposide and cisplatin was used successfully in a small series of 5 patients.19 Chemotherapy generally is reserved for patients with recurrent or metastatic dis- ease or those at high risk of relapse.10 St Jude Children’s
Research Hospital currently has an open protocol for these patients, in which mitotane, cisplatin, and etopo- side are the chemotherapeutic agents used for high-risk patients. We currently are in the process of opening this protocol in our institution, and we treat our patients according to it. Two of our patients had stage II disease with extensive lymph node involvement and received 8 cycles of cisplatin and etoposide.
Differentiation between benign and malignant adreno- cortical tumors is difficult.10 Various histologic classifi- cation systems based on cytologic abnormalities have been proposed.7-9 Prognostic factors have been difficult to determine given the rarity of adrenocortical tumors. A young age at diagnosis seems to be a good prognostic factor, with an 82% long-term survival rate in children less than 2 years of age.6,20 In contrast, children older than 2 years of age have a survival rate of 29%.21 Most of the patients in our study were less than 2 years of age, which may contribute to the good overall outcome of our patients. The other factor explaining our results is that none of our patients presented with advanced disease.
From previous reports it is clear that incomplete re- section has a negative effect on outcome.21,22 In children, the 2-year survival rate jumped from 46% for all adre- nocortical tumors to 67% for those who underwent a complete surgical excision.22 All of the patients in our series underwent complete surgical excision. The 2 pa- tients with intraoperative spillage have no evidence of recurrence; however, the duration of follow-up has been short.
The prognostic importance of histology versus tumor weight continues to be controversial. In a comparison between adult and pediatric adrenocortical tumors, it was found that histologic features are not reliable prognosti- cators in children because even benign pediatric adreno- cortical tumors often show elements suggestive of ma- lignancy.1 Lefevre et al16 also concluded earlier that histologic classification is not of prognostic significance. Others have found that patients with adenomas generally have a better outcome, although cure often is possible for patients with carcinomas.9 Tumor size seems to be of prognostic significance. A study by Michalkiewicz et al23 showed that patients with a tumor weight less than 100 g or a volume of less than 200 cm3 have an excellent prognosis with a 90% disease-free survival at a median follow-up of 2.3 years. There were virtually no survivors in patients with metastatic stage IV disease.
The optimal treatment of pediatric adrenocortical tu- mors has yet to be determined. Our study shows, as in previous studies, that complete surgical resection contin- ues to be the mainstay of treatment for this tumor. The need for lymph node biopsy and RLND has not been properly assessed in other studies. Our data suggest that it may not be necessary in completely resected small tumors given the good prognosis for early-stage disease. Whether RLND and chemotherapy for more advanced disease will have a significant impact on local recurrence and survival needs to be addressed in a larger patient population, and consequently we encourage centers to open available protocols in their own institution.
REFERENCES
1. Cagle PT, Hough AJ, Pysher TJ, et al: Comparison of adrenal cortical tumors in children and adults. Cancer 57:2235-2237, 1986
2. Chudler RM, Kay R: Adrenocortical carcinoma in children. Urol Clin North Am 16:469-479, 1989
3. McWhirter WR, Stiller CA, Lennox EL: Carcinomas in child- hood. A registry-based study of incidence and survival. Cancer 63: 2242-2246, 1989
4. Driver CP, Birch J, Gough DC, et al: Adrenal cortical tumors in childhood. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 15:527-532, 1998
5. Ribeiro RC, Michalkiewicz EL, Figueiredo BC, et al: Adreno- cortical tumors in children. Braz J Med Biol Res 33:1225-1234, 2000
6. Sandrini R, Ribeiro RC, DeLacerda L: Extensive personal expe- rience. Childhood adrenocortical tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:2027-2031, 1997
7. Weiss LM, Medeiros LJ, Vickery AL Jr: Pathologic features of prognostic significance in adrenocortical carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 13:202-206, 1989
8. Hough AJ, Hollified JW, Page DL, et al: Prognostic factors in adrenal cortical tumors. A mathematical analysis of clinical and mor- phologic data. Am J Clin Pathol 72:390-399, 1979
9. Bugg MF, Ribeiro RC, Roberson PK, et al: Correlation of pathologic features with clinical outcome in pediatric adrenocortical neoplasia. A study of a Brazilian population. Brazilian Group for Treatment of Child- hood Adrenocortical Tumors. Am J Clin Pathol 101:625-629, 1994
10. Lack E, Mulvihill J, Travis W, et al: Adrenal cortical neoplasms in the paediatric and adolescent age group. Clinicopathologic study of
30 cases with emphasis on epidemiological and prognostic factors. Pathol Annual 27:1-53, 1992
11. Patil KK, Ransley M, McCullagh M, et al: Functioning adreno- cortical neoplasms in children. BJU Int 89:562-565, 2002
12. Li JT, Shu SG, Chi CS: Aldosterone-secreting adrenal cortical adenoma in an 11 year old child and collective review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr 153:715-717, 1994
13. Israel GM, Krinsky GA: MR imaging of the kidneys and adrenal gland. Radiol Clin North Am 41:145-159, 2003
14. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Radecki PD, et al: Distinc- tion between benign and malignant adrenal masses: Value of T1 weighted chemical shift MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 165:579-583, 1995
15. Liou LS, Kay R: Adrenocortical carcinoma in children. Review and recent innovations. Urol Clin North Am 27:403-421, 2000
16. Lefevre M, Gerard-Marchant R, Gubler JP, et al: Adrenal cortical carcinoma in children: 42 patients treated from 1958 to 1980 at Villjuif, in, Humphery GB (ed): Adrenal and Endocrine Tumors in Children. Boston, MA (chap 11), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1983, pp 265-276
17. Teinturier C, Pauchard MS, Brugieres L, et al: Clinical and prognostic aspects of adrenocortical neoplasms in childhood. Med Pediatr Oncol 32:106-111, 1999
18. Mayer SK, Oligny C, Deal S, et al: Childhood adrenocortical tumors: Case series and reevaluation of prognosis-A 24 year experi- ence. J Pediatr Surg 32:911-915, 1997
19. Hovi L, Wikstrom S, Vettenranta K, et al: Adrenocortical carcinoma in children: A role for etoposide and cisplatin adju- vant therapy? A preliminary report. Med Pediatr Oncol 40:324-326, 2003
20. Sabbaga CC, Avilla SG, Schulz C, et al: Adrenocortical carci- noma in children. Clinical aspects and prognosis. J Pediatr Surg 28:841-843, 1993
21. Ciftci A, Senocak ME, Tanyel FC, et al: Adrenocortical tumors in children. J Pediatr Surg 36:549-554, 2001
22. Sawin RS: Functioning adrenal neoplasms. Semin Pediatr Surg 6:156-163, 1997
23. Michalkiewicz EL, Sandrini R, Bugg M, et al: Clinical charac- teristics of small functioning adrenocortical tumors in children. Med Pediatr Oncol 28:175-178, 1997