CASE REPORT

Symptomatic Intraspinal Oncocytic Adrenocortical Adenoma

Jens Schittenhelm . Florian H. Ebner . Patrick Harter . Antje Bornemann

Published online: 28 November 2008 C Humana Press Inc. 2008

Abstract Most intraspinal neoplasms of epithelial origin are metastases from primary carcinomas. Benign epithelial tumors are rarely found at this site. We here present the case of a 44-year-old woman with a lesion in the cauda equina that fulfilled the radiologic criteria of schwannoma and caused clinical symptoms for 3 years. The excised tumor was composed of nests of large polygonal cells with eosinophilic partial granular cytoplasm. Significant atypia, necrosis, and mitosis were absent from this lesion. The tumor showed diffuse positivity for melan-A, synaptophy- sin, and alpha-inhibin. Steroidogenic factor 1 and cytoker- atins 8 and 18 were focally seen in the absence of S-100 and chromogranin. This immunoprofile indicated adreno- cortical origin. Ultrastructural examination showed abun- dant mitochondria, suggesting an oncocytic tumor. The diagnosis of an oncocytic adrenal cortical adenoma was made. These extraadrenal tumors are thought to arise from heterotopic adrenocortical tissue in the spinal cavity. Oncocytic tumors are rare neoplasms and they comprise

J. Schittenhelm ☒ · A. Bornemann

Institute of Brain Research, University Tuebingen, Calwerstr. 3,

72076 Tübingen, Germany e-mail: jens.schittenhelm@med.uni-tuebingen.de

F. H. Ebner Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany

P. Harter

Department of Neuropathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

P. Harter

Institute of Neurology (Edinger Institute), Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany

non-functioning variants of adrenal cortical adenomas. To date, only five such intraspinal tumors have been observed. Immunohistochemistry excluded oncocytic paraganglioma, oncocytic meningioma, renal cell carcinoma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, and granular cell tumor. A view of the literature of these rare but probably underdiagnosed intra- spinal tumors is given.

Keywords spinal cord tumor · oncocytic adrenal cortical adenoma · melan-A · synaptophysin · alpha-inhibin

Introduction

Adenomas are benign epithelial neoplasms that are derived from glands. Adrenal cortical adenomas are endocrine in nature and may be functioning or non-functioning [1]. Non- functioning adenomas can go undiagnosed and lesions more than 0.3 cm in greatest dimension have been detected in 3.6% at autopsies of asymptomatic individuals [2]. In patients, “incidentalomas” are detected in increasing numb- ers with high-resolution imaging techniques up to 5% of cases examined [1]. In addition to the adrenal cortex, ectopic tissue has been reported in almost every organ including the central nervous system [3, 4]. Oncocytic neoplasms of adrenal cortical tissue are rare with up to 46 cases reported to date [5]. Similar to oncocytomas of kidney, thyroid, and pituitary, they show no signs of recurrence or metastasis and most of them are hormonally silent [2]. To date, only five intraspinal oncocytomas have been observed. All of them were adrenal cortical adenomas (Table 1).

The presence of an oncocytic adrenal cortical adenoma in the spinal canal was first reported by Kepes et al. [6] in a child and since then to date four more such intraspinal tumors have been reported [7-9]. All intraspinal cases of oncocytic

Table 1 Overview of confirmed and probable intraspinal adrenal cortical adenomas
Author (year)AgeSexLocationDuration symptomsRemarks
Kepes et al. [6]8FL23 weeksAssociated filum terminale lipoma
Mitchell et al. [9]16FL23 months11-year recurrence-free interval
Mitchell et al. [9]63FCauda equina10 monthsAssociated squamous cell carcinoma
Kim et al. [19]40FTh11-L11 yearClassified as "Oncocytic paraganglioma"
Park et al. [20]12FL16 monthsClassified as "oncocytoma of the spinal cord"
Cassarino et al. [7]27MConus medullaris1 year
Karikari et al. [8]27FL28 weeksAssociated filum terminale lipoma
Park et al. [21]40FL1-L43 monthsClassified as "oncocytoma of the spinal cord"
Current case44FL13 years

M male, F female

adrenal cortical adenoma reported to date are located in the lumbar region and in two cases were associated with a lipoma. The preoperative diagnosis was myxopapillary ependymoma or schwannoma. All except one case were female and there is no age predilection, spanning the whole spectrum from 8 to 63 years. To confirm the adrenocortical origin of the tumors, radioimmunoassay for androstenedione or enzymatic determination of 3ß-hydroxysteroid dehydro- genase has been employed. Other methods included immu- nostains for adrenal steroidogenic enzymes as P-45011 [beta] hydroxylase, P-450 21 hydroxylase, and P-450-17 alpha hydroxylase [6]. The oncocytic nature of these tumors was confirmed by electron microscopy showing numerous enlarged mitochondria [6, 7].

So far, all of the intraspinal oncocytomas behaved in a benign manner and were cured by gross total resection. There were no reports of tumor recurrence for up to 11 years. We here report another case of an oncocytic benign lesion located in the cauda equina at level L1 which was diagnosed as ectopic adrenocortical adenoma.

Case Report

The 44-year-old female presented with a 3-year history of progressive bilateral leg pain resulting in paresis and reduced

walking ability. There were no bowel or bladder symptoms. Signs of clinical virilization or cushingoid habitus were absent. There was no history of weight loss or spinal cord injuries. Sensibility, coordination, and tendon reflexes were normal. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine showed a well-defined right-sided intraspinal mass measuring 2.5 cm in diameter that occupied the spinal canal at L1 level immediately below the medullary conus. This prompted the diagnosis of a schwannoma (Fig. 1). Standard preoperative laboratory evaluation was within normal limits. Microsurgi- cal removal was performed via hemilaminectomy and rendered a brown intradural mass without clear adherence to the nerve roots. A gross total resection was achieved. The postoperative course was uneventful.

Histopathological analysis of the tumor specimen showed large round to polygonal epithelial cells arranged in nests and cords (Fig. 2a). Most nuclei were round and regular, but focally giant hyperchromatic nuclei with inclusions or multinuclear cells were present (Fig. 2b). The cytoplasm of the cells was pale eosinophilic and cells appeared granular (Fig. 2b, arrows). No evidence of atypia, mitotic activity, or necrosis was seen. Periodic acid Schiff (PAS) stain showed very faint positivity of the cytoplasmic granules probably corresponding to lysosomes. Focal sinusoidal dilatation of the capillary lumina was seen (Fig. 2b), but cytoplasmic vacuolization or stromal tissue

Fig. 1 a Transversal T1WI showing an intraspinal parame- dian mass lesion. The lesion is iso-dense to hyperdense and does not cause edema. b The lesion enhances homogeneously after gadolinium administration. c On sagittal T2WI, the lesions appears iso-dense to hyperdense and is located at the level of L1, immediately below the medul- lary conus

H

L 1

a

b

C

Fig. 2 Histological examination shows large polygonal eosino- philic cells (a, HE) with abun- dant granular cytoplasm (b, PAS-Orange-G). By immuno- histochemistry, the cells show focal positivity for simple epi- thelial markers (c: CK8, d: CK18) and stain strongly for melan-A (e), synaptophysin (f), and inhibin (g). Nuclear expres- sion of steroidogenic factor 1 (h) indicating adrenocortical origin (scale bars 100 um)

a

HE

b

HE

C

CK8

d

CK18

e

Melan-A

f

Synaptophysin

g

a-Inhibin

h

SF-1

was absent. While immunostaining for pan-cytokeratin (clone MNF116) and keratins (AE1/AE3), cytokeratins 7 and 20 were negative; some tumor cells showed strong perimembranous expression of cytokeratin 8 (Fig. 2c) and to a lesser extent cytokeratin 18 (Fig. 2d) suggesting epithelial origin of the tumor cells. Additional stains demonstrated strong cytoplasmic positivity in most tumor cells for melan-A (MART-1, Fig. 2e), synaptophysin

(Fig. 2f), and alpha-inhibin (Fig. 2g). In contrast, the tumor was negative for S-100, glial-fibrillary acidic protein, neuron-specific enolase (NSE), chromogranin A, epithelial membrane antigen, thyroid transcription factor 1, thyro- globulin, smooth muscle actin, CD117 (c-KIT), and human melanoma black (HMB-45). Expression of vimentin was restricted to vessels and interstitial connective tissue cells. The proliferation index for Ki67 (MiB-1) was 3% and the

number of p53-expressing nuclei was similar. In addition, the nuclei stained positive for steroidogenic factor 1 (Ad4BP/SF-1, Fig. 2h) which is involved in adrenal steroidogenesis. Electron microscopy revealed abundant mitochondria in the tumor cells (Fig. 3) and confirmed the oncocytic nature of the tumor.

Taken together, this was a benign oncocytic tumor that showed the immunoprofile of an adrenal cortical adenoma; hence, the diagnosis of an oncocytic adrenocortical adeno- ma was made. The lack of mitotic activity and invasion as well as the clinical history ruled out the possibility of an adrenocortical carcinoma. In addition, follow-up magnetic resonance imagings of the adrenal gland showed no tumor.

Discussion

The tumor described here fulfilled all diagnostic criteria for a benign oncocytic adrenal cortical neoplasm. Positive expression of steroidogenic factor 1 [10], melan-A [11], alpha-inhibin [12], neuron-specific enolase [13], and synap- tophysin [13] has been previously used to diagnose cortical adenomas. Coupled with negative immunostaining for chromogranin, S-100, and HMB-45, this ascertained the diagnosis [5, 13]. Histologic criteria indicative of malignancy (defined as major criteria according to Lin. et al.) consisting of more than five mitoses in 50 high-power fields, atypical mitoses, or venous invasion and uncertain malignant potential (minor criteria) such as large tumor size, necrosis, and capsular or sinusoidal invasion were absent [13]. The definitional criteria for a oncocytic adrenocortical adenomas consisting of eosinophilic (granular) cytoplasm, high nuclear grade, and diffuse growth were met [13].

Fig. 3 Electron micrograph: abundant mitochondria fill the cytoplasm of a tumor cell

The origin of intraspinal adrenal tumors is not clear. It is assumed that they are derived from ectopic adrenocortical tissue. These are “adrenal rests” and may be found along the embryonic migration path in spermatic cord, adnexa of testes, groin, and retroperitoneal space [14, 15]. The most common site for adrenal ectopic tumors is the kidney. Clinical symptoms in the current case were directly attributed to compression of spinal structures, again distinguishing the neoplastic lesion in the current case from adrenal rest.

Oncocytic tumors include paraganglioma, meningioma, alveolar soft part sarcoma, granular cell tumor, and carcinoma. Our case lacked the typical features of para- ganglioma, i.e., “zellballen architektur,” chromogranin expression, and S-100-positive sustentacular cells. Onco- cytic meningiomas express epithelial membrane antigen and usually show typical meningothelial features [16]. Alveolar soft part sarcomas reveal intracellular PAS- positive crystalline material and varying amounts of glycogen. These may occasionally express S-100 and NSE but lack the synaptophysin expression seen in our cortical adenoma. In addition, variable muscle marker expression is seen in more than 50% of the alveolar soft part sarcomas [17]. Our case did not show expression of markers for any myogenic differentiation. In addition, oncocytic renal cell carcinoma was ruled out due to the bland histology and lack of immunoreactivity for cytoker- atin 7, CD10, or vimentin. Negative immunostaining of S- 100 and lack of PAS-positive inclusions also ruled out granular cell tumor. Finally, there is an unusual case report of the oncocytic variant of an intraspinal melanocytoma displaying melanin pigment deposits and immunopositivity of S-100 and HMB-45 that our case lacked [18].

Cassarino et al. [7] noted another two oncocytic neo- plasms within the lumbar region, one of which was classified as oncocytic paraganglioma but does not herald evidence of sustentacular cells or S-100 expression [19, 20]. A search of the literature reveals another case recently published [21]. In all cases, it might be possible that these tumors are adrenal cortical adenomas. Moran and colleagues [22] examined 30 spinal paragangliomas and noted eosinophilic granular cells in two cases “suggestive of oncocytic metaplasia” but did not go into detail whether they were devoid of chromogranin and S-100. In another case of an oncocytic paraganglioma showing focal cytokeratin expression, the authors speculated “that they are derived from (misplaced) endoderm, rather than from visceral-autonomic paraganglia” but since they also report immunopositivity of S-100 protein this case remains enigmatic [23].

Previous cases of adrenal cortical adenomas were mainly ascertained by enzyme histochemistry. The present case demonstrates the usefulness of an immunohistochemistry panel (synaptophysin, melan-A, S-100, GFAP, chromogra- nin, CK18) in paraffin-embedded material together with

electron microscopy to establish the proper diagnosis. Inhibin and melan-A staining has been employed only in the two most recent studies and showed positivity for both markers [7, 8], while all tumors shown in Table 1 were negative for GFAP, S-100. These were also negative for chromogranin A, except for the initial study that did not use a chromogranin antibody [6]. Almost all studies reporting the tumors to be negative for cytokeratins have employed keratin cocktails. These results need to be interpreted with caution as shown in the current case which was also negative for AE1/AE3 but demonstrated strong immunore- activity for low-level keratins CK8 and CK18 which are consistently seen in oncocytic adrenal neoplasms [13]. Results on vimentin and NSE are mixed; some cases have been reported as positive others as negative without further going into detail which types of cells have been stained [6- 9, 13]. In agreement with the description of Mitchell and colleagues [9], we report that expression of vimentin is restricted to delicate interstitial connective tissues and vessels but not in tumor cells.

Taken together, intraspinal oncocytic adrenal cortical adenoma are non-functioning and mimic the clinical and radiographic features of schwannomas. Gross total resec- tion appears to be curative. Use of an immunostaining panel consisting of alpha-inhibin, synaptophysin, melan-A, S- 100, chromogranin, CK18, and SF-1 allows for establishing the proper diagnosis.

Acknowledgement We like to thank Prof. Stephan Störkel, Institute of Pathology, Helios Kliniken Wuppertal and Prof. Falko Fend, Institute of Pathology, University Tübingen for helpful discussions and Katrin Trautmann for technical help.

References

1. Stewart PM. The adrenal cortex. In: Larsen PR, Kronenberg HM, Melmed S, Polonsky KS, eds. Williams textbook of endocrinol- ogy. 10th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, pp. 491-551, 2003.

2. Sasano H, Suzuki T, Sano T, Kameya T, Sasano N, Nagura H. Adrenocortical oncocytoma. A true nonfunctioning adrenocortical tumor. Am J Surg Pathol 15:949-56, 1991. doi:10.1097/ 00000478-199110000-00005.

3. Drut R, Quijano G, Altamirano ME, Jones MC, Maffessoli OB. Vascular malformation and choroid plexus adrenal heterotopia: new findings in Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome? Fetal Pediatr Pathol 25:191-7, 2006. doi:10.1080/15513810601015704.

4. Wiener MF, Dallgaard SA. Intracranial adrenal gland; a case report. AMA Arch Pathol 67:228-33, 1959.

5. Kabayegit OY, Soysal D, Oruk G, Ustaoglu B, Kosan U, Solmaz S, Avci A. Adrenocortical oncocytic neoplasm presenting with Cushing’s syndrome: a case report. J Med Case Reports 2:228, 2008. doi:10.1186/1752-1947-2-228.

6. Kepes JJ, O’Boynick P, Jones S, Baum D, McMillan J, Adams ME. Adrenal cortical adenoma in the spinal canal of an 8-year-old

girl. Am J Surg Pathol 14:481-4, 1990. doi:10.1097/00000478- 199005000-00008.

7. Cassarino DS, Santi M, Arruda A, Patrocinio R, Tsokos M, Ghatak N, Quezado M. Spinal adrenal cortical adenoma with oncocytic features: report of the first intramedullary case and review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol 12:259-64, 2004. doi:10.1177/106689690401200309.

8. Karikari IO, Uschold TD, Selznick LA, Carter JH, Cummings TJ, Friedman AH. Primary spinal intramedullary adrenal cortical adenoma associated with spinal dysraphism: case report. Neurosur- gery 59:E1144, 2006. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000245588.31334.83.

9. Mitchell A, Scheithauer BW, Sasano H, Hubbard EW, Ebersold MJ. Symptomatic intradural adrenal adenoma of the spinal nerve root: report of two cases. Neurosurgery 32:658-61, 1993. doi:10.1097/00006123-199304000-00024.

10. Kiiveri S, Liu J, Arola J, Heikkila P, Kuulasmaa T, Lehtonen E, Voutilainen R, Heikinheimo M. Transcription factors GATA-6, SF-1, and cell proliferation in human adrenocortical tumors. Mol Cell Endocrinol 233:47-56, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2005.01.012.

11. Busam KJ, Iversen K, Coplan KA, Old LJ, Stockert E, Chen YT, McGregor D, Jungbluth A. Immunoreactivity for A103, an antibody to melan-A (Mart-1), in adrenocortical and other steroid tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 22:57-63, 1998. doi:10.1097/ 00000478-199801000-00007.

12. McCluggage WG, Burton J, Maxwell P, Sloan JM. Immunohis- tochemical staining of normal, hyperplastic, and neoplastic adrenal cortex with a monoclonal antibody against alpha inhibin. J Clin Pathol 51:114-6, 1998.

13. Bisceglia M, Ludovico O, Di Mattia A, Ben-Dor D, Sandbank J, Pasquinelli G, Lau SK, Weiss LM. Adrenocortical oncocytic tumors: report of 10 cases and review of the literature. Int J Surg Pathol 12:231-43, 2004. doi:10.1177/106689690401200304.

14. Barwick TD, Malhotra A, Webb JA, Savage MO, Reznek RH. Embryology of the adrenal glands and its relevance to diagnostic imaging. Clin Radiol 60:953-9, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2005.04.006.

15. Mares AJ, Shkolnik A, Sacks M, Feuchtwanger MM. Aberrant (ectopic) adrenocortical tissue along the spermatic cord. J Pediatr Surg 15:289-92, 1980. doi:10.1016/S0022-3468(80)80139-4.

16. Roncaroli F, Riccioni L, Cerati M, Capella C, Calbucci F, Trevisan C, Eusebi V. Oncocytic meningioma. Am J Surg Pathol 21:375-82, 1997. doi:10.1097/00000478-199704000-00002.

17. Weiss SW, Goldblum JR. Enzinger & Weiss’s soft tissue tumors. 5th ed. London: Mosby, pp. 1161-220, 2008.

18. Gelman BB, Trier TT, Chaljub G, Borokowski J, Nauta HJ. Oncocytoma in melanocytoma of the spinal cord: case report. Neurosurgery 47:756-9, 2000. doi:10.1097/00006123- 200009000-00046.

19. Kim SH, Paik S, Yoon DH, Kim TS. Oncocytoma of the spinal cord. Case report. J Neurosurg 94:310-2, 2001.

20. Park DH, Park YK, Oh JI, Kwon TH, Chung HS, Cho HD, Suh YL. Oncocytic paraganglioma of the cauda equina in a child. Case report and review of the literature. Pediatr Neurosurg 36:260-5, 2002. doi:10.1159/000058430.

21. Park HS, Jang KY, Kang MJ, Song KJ, Lee KB. Oncocytoma of the spinal cord causing paraplegia-a case report. Spinal Cord 45:183-6, 2007. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3101905.

22. Moran CA, Rush W, Mena H. Primary spinal paragangliomas: a clinicopathological and immunohistochemical study of 30 cases. Histopathology 31:167-73, 1997. doi:10.1046/j.1365- 2559.1997.2300841.x.

23. Gaffney EF, Doorly T, Dinn JJ. Aggressive oncocytic neuroendo- crine tumour (‘oncocytic paraganglioma’) of the cauda equina. Histopathology 10:311-9, 1986. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1986. tb02485.x.