MEDICINE

☐ CASE REPORT ☐

Adrenocortical Carcinoma Treated by CyberKnife

Yuko Harada1 and Shinichiro Miyazaki2

Abstract

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignancy with a poor prognosis. The effective treatment for advanced cancer remains unknown. A 61-year-old woman underwent CyberKnife treatment on a large adrenocortical carcinoma and tumor emboli in both pulmonary arteries. Follow-up positron emission tomography scanning with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) revealed that the FDG uptake was greatly decreased in all the tumors, and the hormone levels were also decreased. CyberKnife is a safe and effective treatment option for the non- operative large advanced adrenocortical carcinoma.

Key words: adrenocortical carcinoma, CyberKnife, radiation therapy

(Intern Med 55: 2031-2034, 2016) (DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.55.6335)

Introduction

Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare malignancy with an in- cidence of 0.7-2.0 cases/million habitants/year (1). The prognosis is very poor. The tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification proposed by the European Network for the Study of Adrenal Tumors classification is recommended (2), in which stage IV is defined by the presence of distant me- tastasis, with an estimated five-year disease-specific survival rate of 13%. Complete surgical resection is the only poten- tially curative treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma (3), and there is no curative treatment for unresectable cancer.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of the successful CyberKnife treatment for primary adrenal cancer in Japan.

Case Report

A 61-year-old woman presented with syncope when she bent forward to pick up a heavy package. She had a medical history of hypertension. She had noticed virilization within a few months. Abdominal CT revealed a large mass measuring 98×79×100 mm, consistent with a large adrenal tumor, and mass emboli in the bilateral pulmonary artery and small mass lesions in the lungs (Fig. 1, 2). The adrenal tumor in- filtrated to the left adrenal vein, the left renal vein and then

into the inferior vena cava. positron emission tomography (PET) scanning with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) revealed an increased FDG uptake in this tumor and also in the mass emboli and the mass lesions in the lungs, which was consis- tent with large adrenal cancer with pulmonary embolism and pulmonary metastasis (Fig. 3). The adrenocorticotropic hor- mone (ACTH) level was undetectable and the cortisol level was 29.1 µg/L. A low-dose dexamethasone suppression test revealed hypercortisolism according to the undetectable ACTH level and an un-suppressed cortisol level of 24.1 ug/ L. Because the patient did not exhibit any characteristic fea- tures of Cushing’s syndrome, such as a fatty hump between the shoulders, rounded face or red stretch marks on the skin, she was diagnosed with subclinical Cushing’s syndrome. The serum aldosterone level was elevated to 299.2 pg/mL, however, the potassium level was 4.7 mEq/L and the plasma renin activity was 18.9 ng/ml/h, thus aldosterone-producing adenoma was ruled out. The dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) level was markedly increased to 2,170 µg/L, which was suggestive of adrenocortical carcinoma along with the findings of PET scanning.

The emboli in the bilateral pulmonary artery appeared to be a mixture of thrombus and tumor, as they exhibited calci- fication, and the D-dimer level was elevated to 4.9 ug/L. A vascular echogram of the lower limbs revealed a thrombus measuring 3 mm in the right soleal vein, therefore we speculated that the cause of the pulmonary embolism was

‘Department of Internal Medicine, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, Japan and 2Department of Radiology, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, Japan

Figure 1. A CT scan before the treatment showing emboli (arrows) in the bilateral pulmonary ar- tery. Note the calcification in the mass defect in the right pulmonary artery.

P

Figure 2. A CT scan before the treatment showing a giant tumor (arrows) in the left adrenal gland. The cancer infiltrates into the vessels and the paraaortic lymph node (arrows) is swollen.

A

Spin: 1 Tilt: 0

P

F

both tumor emboli and thrombi.

According to the above findings, the patient was diag- nosed with stage IV adrenocortical carcinoma due to multi- ple lung metastases. The pulmonary embolism and infiltra- tion to the inferior vena cava put her at a high risk of com- plications by general anesthesia. The patient refused chemo- therapy and opted for CyberKnife treatment of the adrenal cancer and pulmonary emboli.

The patient underwent CyberKnife treatment for the adre- nal cancer and paraaortic lymph node swelling. The tumor volume was 483 cm3 and the prescribed radiation dosage was 45 Gy, 15 fractions with 61% isodose line. She subse- quently underwent another CyberKnife treatment for the

pulmonary emboli. For the embolus of the right pulmonary artery, the tumor volume was 27 cm3 and the prescribed ra- diation dosage was 35 Gy, 7 fractions with 76% isodose line. For the embolus of the left pulmonary artery, the tumor volume was 24 cm3 and the prescribed radiation dosage was 36 Gy, 6 fractions with 72% isodose line. During the treat- ment for the pulmonary emboli, anticoagulation therapy with heparin and warfarin was started. After two weeks, the thrombus in the right soleal vein disappeared, the D-dimer level decreased to within the normal range, and warfarin was continued thereafter.

Four months later the patient had no symptoms and her general condition was excellent. Her blood pressure was

Figure 3. FDG-PET before the treatment. The FDG uptake is observed in both the tumor and the paraaortic lymph node.

F

F

0

Figure 4. FDG-PET 4 months after the treatment. The FDG uptake is remarkably decreased in the tumor.

H

F

F

normal without medication, and virilization was not ob- served. The cortisol level normalized to 17.9 ug/L and DHEA-S decreased to 1,542 ug/L, which was 70% of the pre-treatment level. FDG-PET showed that the FDG uptake was remarkably decreased in the tumor, the emboli, and the

paraaortic lymph node (Fig. 4).

Discussion

There is no effective treatment for stage IV adrenocortical

cancer. Mitotane is currently the only potential treatment. However, our case showed that CyberKnife is a promising and safe treatment option for this devastating cancer.

In 1990, Luton et al. studied 105 patients with adrenocor- tical carcinoma and reported the clinical features and the ef- fect of mitotane therapy (4). They concluded that the first therapeutic approach to adrenocortical carcinoma is surgical resection even in patients with extensive metastatic disease, and radiotherapy is ineffective and should be considered only as palliative treatment for metastatic disease, whereas mitotane should be used as adjuvant therapy after aggressive surgery despite the lack of a significant effect on the sur- vival. However, a recent review of various studies showed that the objective response rate of mitotane treatment is at best 24% (5). A large-scale international study, the first in- ternational randomized trial in locally advanced and metas- tatic adrenocortical carcinoma treatment (FIRM-ACT) trial, showed that patients who received mitotane plus a combina- tion of etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin had a higher re- sponse rate than those in the streptozocin-mitotane group (23.2% vs. 9.2%), although there was no significant differ- ence in the overall survival (6). Another disadvantage of mi- totane is that it has a narrow therapeutic window and ad- verse effects occur in more than 80% of all patients and are often dose-limiting (7). Even the most promising chemother- apy has unsatisfactory effects on this cancer, and patients suffer from serious adverse effects.

In the pertinent literature, there are only two reports on CyberKnife treatment for adrenal tumor: a retrospective analysis of 26 patients from China (8), and that of 4 patients from India (9). The former study included 8 cases of pri- mary adrenal tumors and 18 cases of metastatic adrenal tu- mors, with 3 patients achieving CR, 12 patients with PR, 5 patients with stable disease, and 6 patients with progressive illness in 3 months. The average tumor volume was 72.1 cm3 and the prescribed radiation dosage ranged from 30-50 Gy (8). The latter report from India was the treatment on adrenal metastasis, with 2 patients achieving CR and 2 pa- tients with PR in 2-3 months. The median gross tumor vol- ume (GTV) was 20.5 cm3 and the minimum dose of GTV ranged from 12.1-31.1 Gy (9). None of the cases had a gi- ant tumor, as in our case, yet they showed favorable results with minimal complications. There are some other reports of CyberKnife treatment on adrenal metastasis, however, radio- therapy is still not recommended for primary adrenal cancer.

This is the first case report of CyberKnife treatment on a gi- ant adrenocortical carcinoma for which other treatment was ineffective or not recommended.

The adrenal gland is adjacent to the kidney, stomach, pan- creas, and intestines. The delivery of large radiation doses with high spatial precision is crucial to avoid the radiation injury to the surrounding healthy tissues. CyberKnife is one type of stereotactic radiosurgery systems which deliver beams of high-dose radiation to tumors with extreme accu- racy. Our case underwent CyberKnife treatment for a large unresectable tumor and pulmonary emboli and achieved PR with no complications. All the symptoms resolved and the patient was able to return to her normal life at 6 months af- ter the therapy. CyberKnife is a very effective and safe treat- ment to control adrenocortical carcinoma and can improve the patients’ quality of life.

The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).

References

1. Libe R. Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC): diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Front Cell Dev Biol 3: 45, 2015.

2. Fassnacht M, Johanssen S, Quinkler M, et al. Limited prognostic value of the 2004 International Union Against Cancer staging clas- sification for adrenocortical carcinoma: proposal for a Revised TNM Classification. Cancer 115: 243-250, 2009.

3. Allolio B, Hahner S, Weismann D, Fassnacht M. Management of adrenocortical carcinoma. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 60: 273-287, 2004.

4. Luton JP, Cerdas S, Billaud L, et al. Clinical features of adreno- cortical carcinoma, prognostic factors, and the effect of mitotane therapy. N Engl J Med 322: 1195-1201, 1990.

5. De Francia S, Ardito A, Daffara F, et al. Mitotane treatment for adrenocortical carcinoma: an overview. Minerva Endocrinol 37: 9- 23, 2012.

6. Fassnacht M, Terzolo M, Allolio B, et al. Combination chemother- apy in advanced adrenocortical carcinoma. N Engl J Med 366: 2189-2197, 2012.

7. Allolio B, Fassnacht M. Clinical review: adrenocortical carcinoma: clinical update. J Clin Endoclinol Metab 91: 2027-2037, 2006.

8. Li J, Shi Z, Wang Z, et al. Treating adrenal tumors in 26 patients with CyberKnife: a mono-institutional experience. PLoS One 8: e 80654, 2013.

9. Basu T, Kataria T, Abhishek A, et al. Cyberknife fractionated ra- diotherapy for adrenal metastases: preliminary report from a multispecialty Indian cancer care center. Int J Cancer Ther Oncol 3: 03012, 2015.

C 2016 The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine http://www.naika.or.jp/imonline/index.html