Pergamon

0006-2952(95)00028-3

BOVINE ADRENAL CORTEX TRANSFORMATIONS OF MITOTANE [1-(2-CHLOROPHENYL)-1-(4-CHLOROPHENYL)- 2,2-DICHLOROETHANE; o,p’-DDD] AND ITS p,p’- AND m,p’-ISOMERS

WEI CAI,* RICHARDO BENITEZ,; RAYMOND E. COUNSELL,# TANYA DJANEGARA,* DAVID E. SCHTEINGART,+ JOSEPH E. SINSHEIMER*§ and LINDA L. WOTRING*

*College of Pharmacy and Departments of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology, Medical School, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, U.S.A.

(Received 15 July 1994; accepted 8 November 1994)

Abstract-The adrenalytic activity of mitotane (o,p’-DDD) has made it useful in the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma and Cushing’s syndrome. In support of a study to develop mitotane analogs as more effective therapeutic agents and as a basis for understanding the toxicity of related compounds in the adrenals, the biotransformations of o,p’-DDD in adrenocortical homogenate preparations have been studied and compared with those of its m,p’- and p,p’-isomers. Aliphatic oxidation to the corresponding acetic acid derivative, o,p’-, m,p’- or p,p’-DDA, was the major transformation for all the preparations. In the comparisons of the DDD isomers, the order of both DDA formation and apparent covalent binding was o,p’- > m,p’- > p,p’-DDD. There was also evidence for @-hydroxylation at the benzylic carbon with subsequent loss of water to form ethylene derivatives. This was a minor pathway for o,p’-DDD, but was the major pathway for the other two isomers. Thus, while the total yields of metabolites of o,p’- and m,p’-DDD were similar and at least twice that of the p,p’-isomer, their distribution of metabolites differed significantly. The effects of the three isomers on cell growth and cortisol production with the human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line, NCI H-295, followed the same order as their DDA formation and tissue binding. It is proposed that hydroxylation by the adrenal cortex at the B-carbon leads to an adrenalytic effect, whereas hydroxylation at the a-carbon would represent an alternate deactivation pathway.

Key words: mitotane; metabolic activation and binding; adrenal transformations; adrenal carcinoma

The localization of mitotane (o,p’-DDD|) in adrenocortical tissue causes destruction of both normal and cancerous cells. Therefore, it has been useful in the treatment of patients with adrenocortical carcinoma [1] and has been employed in the therapy of pituitary ACTH-dependent Cushing’s syndrome [2]. To understand the adrenalytic activity of mitotane, its metabolism has been studied both in vivo [3-5] and in vitro in adrenal preparations [6-10]. In vitro studies have shown that metabolic transformation of mitotane can lead to covalent binding to adrenocortical macromolecules [6, 7]. We have shown previously using adrenal perfusion that both aromatic and aliphatic oxidations of mitotane

§ Corresponding author. Dr. Joseph E. Sinsheimer, College of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1065. Tel. (313) 764-7351; FAX (313) 764-2022.

| Abbreviations: DDD, 1-(2, 3 or 4-chlorophenyl)-1-(4- chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichlorethane; DDE, 1-(2, 3 or 4- chlorophenyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl) -2,2- dichloroethylene; DDA, 1-(2, 3 or 4-chlorophenyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)acetic acid; a-OH-DDD, 1-(2, 3 or 4-chlorophenyl)-1-(4- chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethanol; «-OH-o,p’-DDA, 2,4’- dichlorobenzilic acid; p-OH-DDA, (2 or 3-chloro-4- hydroxyphenyl)-(4-chlorophenyl)acetic acid; and TCA, trichloroacetic acid.

can occur in the adrenals [10]. Such transformations by the adrenal cortex may have significance in understanding the mode of action of mitotane.

Moreover, the ability of adrenals to efficiently transform endogenous hydrophobic substrates could also play a role in the activation of other xenobiotic hydrophobic compounds. This is consistent with adrenal glands having large blood supplies, rich enzyme content and high lipid composition. In this regard, it is of interest that Ribelin [11] in his survey of chemically induced lesions of endocrine glands found that the adrenals were the most frequently affected gland. Also, Colby [12] in a review of chemically induced adrenal gland toxicity lists over forty compounds that have been found to produce lesions in the adrenal cortex.

The purpose of the present study is to report the metabolic activation of o,p’-DDD, m,p’-DDD and p,p’-DDD in adrenal homogenates. This structure- activity information will be utilized in a study to develop mitotane analogs as more effective agents in the treatment of adrenal cancer and as a basis for understanding the toxicity of related compounds in normal adrenals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chemicals. BSA (fraction V, fatty acid-free),

glucose-6-phosphate, glucose-6-phosphate dehydro- genase (type IX), HEPES, and NADP+ were purchased from the Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). The liquid scintillant, Ecolite, was obtained from ICN (Irvine, CA) and the tissue solubilizer, Protosol, from New England Nuclear (Boston, MA).

The reference compounds, 1-(2-chlorophenyl)-1- (4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane (o,p’-DDD, mitotane), bis(4-chlorophenyl)acetic acid (p,p’- DDA), 1,1-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane (p,p’-DDD) and 1,1-bis(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2- dichloroethylene (p.p’-DDE), were purchased from the Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI). 2,4’- Dichlorodiphenylacetic acid (o,p’-DDA), 1-(2- chlorophenyl) - 1 - (4 - chlorophenyl) - 2,2 - dichloro- ethylene (o,p’-DDE) and 1-(3-chlorophenyl)-1-(4- chlorophenyl) - 2,2 - dichloroethane (m,p’-DDD) were obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency (Research Triangle Park, NC). 1,1-Bis(4- chlorophenyl) - 2,2 - dichloroethanol (a-OH-p,p’- DDD), a gift from Rohm & Hass (Philadelphia, PA), was purified as previously noted [9], and our synthesis of 1-(4-hydroxy-2-chlorophenyl)-1-(4- chlorophenyl)acetic acid (p-OH-o,p’-DDA) has been reported [10]. 2,4-Dichlorobenzilic acid (a- OH-o,p’-DDA) was synthesized by the procedure of Inoi et al. [13].

The synthesis of the [14C]DDD isomers by the condensation of 14C uniformly labeled chlorobenzene with 2,2-dichloro-1-(2, 3 or 4-chlorophenyl)ethanols was as previously reported [14]. The specific activity and GC analysis of purity for these isomers were: o,p’-DDD, 83.2 uCi/mmol, 94.0%; p,p’-DDD, 99.9 uCi/mmol, 99.4%; and m,p’-DDD, 95.5 uCi/mmol, 97.8%.

In vitro bovine adrenal metabolism. Bovine adrenal glands obtained from a local slaughterhouse were trimmed of fat and connective tissue, and sliced open; cortex was separated from medulla. The cortices from four glands were weighed, minced and homogenized in 5 vol of 0.25 M sucrose-0.05 M HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) with a Teflon-glass Potter- Elvehjem homogenizer. The mixture was centrifuged at 1000 g at 4° for 15 min. The fat on top of the supernatant and tissue debris were discarded.

The whole homogenate was further centrifuged at 10,000 g for 20 min to precipitate mitochondria, which were washed in sucrose-HEPES buffer and recentrifuged. To obtain the same adrenal wet weight suspension of mitochondria, a volume of buffer was added to the washed pellet to equal the weight of the original homogenate. The 10,000 g supernatant was then recentrifuged at 109,000 g at 4° for 60 min to obtain the microsomal and cytosolic fractions. The microsomal pellet was washed, recentrifuged and adjusted with buffer to the same concentration as the original homogenate. The homogenate fractions were stored at -80° prior to use. Protein concentrations were measured by the Lowry method as modified by Miller [15] with BSA as the standard.

Incubations were carried out in 15-mL centrifuge tubes. The incubation mixture consisted of the following: (A) 1 mL of 2% BSA in 0.25 M sucrose- 0.05 M HEPES buffer (pH 7.4) containing 0.17 mg of [14C]o,p’-DDD (0.14 mM, 0.045 „Ci) or 0.14 mg of [14C]p,p’-DDD (0.11 mM, 0.045 uCi) or 0.15 mg

of [14C]m,p’-DDD (0.12 mM, 0.045 µCi) in 10 AL ethanol; (B) 0.5 mL of 44 umol/mL MgCl2; (C) 0.5 mL of NADPH generating mixture (3.77 umol of NADP+, 44 umol of glycose-6-phosphate, 2.3 units of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase in sucrose-HEPES buffer); and (D) 2 mL enzyme suspension.

The mixtures were incubated at 37° for 17 hr before freezing in dry ice acetone and drying overnight in a freeze drier (Virtis, Consol 12). Each dried incubation mixture was moistened with 0.2 mL of water, acidified with 1 mL of 10% TCA before the addition of methanol (5 mL), vortexed and centrifuged (1500 g). The TCA residue was remixed with methanol (5 mL), and the combined extracts were evaporated to dryness under nitrogen. The washed TCA precipitates were saved for binding studies, while their extraction residues were used for HPLC analysis. These residues were redissolved in 100-120 uL of a methanol stock solution containing reference compounds (DDA, a-OH-DDD, DDD and DDE: 4, 1.5, 1.5 and 1 mg/mL). After vortexing and centrifuging, three aliquots (4 uL) were counted for radioactivity, and the extract (70-100 uL) was analyzed by reverse-phase HPLC as described below.

Covalent binding studies. The TCA precipitates were extracted further with methanol (2 x 5 mL) and suspended in 1 mL of 50% methanol. Protosol (1 mL) was added, and the mixture was shaken overnight in a 45° water bath to dissolve the residue. The sample was acidified with 0.5 mL of concentrated HCI and decolorized with 0.5 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide. The mixture was transferred to a 20-mL scintillation vial, methanol (2 × 1 mL) was used to rinse the tube, and Ecolite (11.6 mL) was added to the vial before counting.

High performance liquid chromatography. A reverse phase columns (5 mm i.d. x 10 cm NOVAK- PAK C-18 Radial Pak Cartridge, Waters) with a radial compressor (Waters RCM-100), protected with a guard cartridge (C-18, 10 uM spherical, 3 cm × 4.6 mm RP-18, MCP™M, Brownlee Lab- oratories) was used for the separation of metabolites. The solvent system employed in the separation was methanol-water-acetic acid (50:50:0.2) at a flow rate of 1.2 mL/min for 40 min and changed over a 10-min period to acetonitrile-water-acetic acid (60:40:0.2). The ratio of solvents in the mobile phase was adjusted for each individual column to obtain a constant retention time for DDA.

After the peak of DDD appeared, the ratio of solvents for acetonitrile-water-acetic acid was changed to 70: 30: 0.2 at the same flow rate to detect metabolites, m,p’-DDE and p,p’-DDE. Fractions (1-min) were collected in 7-mL scintillation vials, Ecolite (5.8 mL) was added, and radioactivity was measured by liquid scintillation counting.

Gas chromatography and mass spectrometry. A Finnigan 4021 GC/MS equipped with a fused silica column (3 m × 0.32 mm) coated with DB-5 was used to identify the metabolites collected from ten HPLC separations of whole homogenate incubations of m,p’-DDD. The column temperature was at 50° for the first 2 min and increased to 275° with a 25°/min program; the injection temperature was 200°. The filament was at 70 e V with the ion source temperature

Table 1. In vitro biotransformation of [14C]o,p'-DDD by fractions from the cortex of bovine adrenals
Fraction% Metabolite formation and total recovery* Total % Apparent @-OH-DDA P-OH-DDA o,p'-DDA a'-OH-DDD o,p'-DDE recovery bindingt
Whole homogenate1.76 ± 1.163.20 ± 1.137.53 ± 0.860.26 ± 0.060.17 ± 0.0695.26 ± 2.454.57 ± 0.89
Blank§-0.330.110.1798.060.16
Cytosolic0.42 ± 0.0797.65 ± 0.370.57 ± 0.07
Blank0.320.02
Mitochondrial0.78 ± 0.134.40 ± 0.300.27 ± 0.170.21 ± 0.1094.52 ± 2.172.15 ± 0.21
Blank0.050.280.1098.810.05
Microsomal0.47 ± 0.1096.33 ± 1.130.56 ± 0.19
Blank0.2498.580.01
Mitochondrial + cytosolic2.11 ± 0.988.34 ± 0.440.52 ± 0.290.49 ± 0.2394.43 ± 0.644.61 ± 0.90
Blank0.080.1998.730.07

* The mean + SD (N = 3) percent of the radioactivity applied to HPLC analysis for individual metabolite peaks with corresponding blank values subtracted. The total recovery is the percent of the applied radioactivity represented by the sum of the metabolite peaks and recovered unmetabolized substrate.

t The mean ± SD (N = 3) percent of total substrate incubated that is bound to protein.

# Assignment of this peak is by comparison to retention times of the a-OH-DDD metabolites of the other isomers.

§ Enzyme preparations had been placed in boiling water prior to incubation.

None detected.

Table 2. In vitro biotransformations of [14C]o,p'-, m.p'- and p.p'-DDD by bovine adrenal cortex
Fraction% Metabolite formation and total recovery*% Apparent bindingt
@-OH-DDAp-OH-DDADDAa-OH-DDDDDETotal
o,p'-DDD1.76 ± 1.163.20 ± 1.137.53 ± 0.860.26 ±0.060.17 ± 0.0695.26 ± 2.454.57 ± 0.89
Blank§-0.330.110.1798.730.16
m,p'-DDD-1.02 ±0.263.08 ± 0.256.75 ±0.322.14 ± 0.1396.58 ± 0.372.42 ±0.62
Blank--0.221.160.7597.430.10
p,p'-DDD--1.09 ± 0.273.85 ± 0.340.83 ± 0.3497.67 ± 0.490.91 ± 0.62
Blank--0.140.110.1199.020.02

* The mean + SD (N = 3) percent of the radioactivity applied to HPLC analysis for individual metabolite peaks with corresponding blank values subtracted. The total recovery is the percent of the applied radioactivity represented by the sum of the metabolite peaks and recovered unmetabolized substrate.

t The mean + SD (N = 3) percent of total substrate incubated that is bound to protein.

# Assignment of this peak is by comparison to retention times of the a-OH-DDD metabolites of the other isomers. § Enzyme preparations had been placed in boiling water prior to incubation. | None detected.

at 150°. Helium with 10 psi pressure was used as a carrier gas. The m,p’-DDA collected by HPLC from the ten separations of metabolites was methylated prior to analysis by GC/MS This was carried out in a diazomethane-generation apparatus (Aldrich, Z 10, 100-1) and by the general method described by Fales et al. [16].

Cell culture studies. The human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line NCI H-295 [17] was used as we previously described for mitotane [18] but with the modification that 2% BSA was added to the medium to solubilize the DDD isomers. The effects of the isomers upon cell proliferation and cortisol production were compared for this steroid secreting cell line.

RESULTS

The relative abundance of the major metabolites of o,p’-DDD formed during incubation in whole adrenal cortex homogenates and their subfractions, together with the total recovery of metabolites and original substrate, is shown in Table 1. In Table 2, the abundance of metabolites and total recovery of o,p’-DDD in the whole homogenate is compared with those of the m,p’- and p,p’-DDD isomers. There was reasonable total recovery of radioactivity as shown in these tables. This recovery with the absence of other radioactive chromatographic peaks is an indication of the stability of the metabolites and substrates under our incubation and isolation conditions. Assignment of HPLC peaks in these tables was based on co-chromatography with the following reference standards: for o,p’-DDD: p- OH-DDA, DDA and DDE; for p,p’-DDD: DDA, @-OH-DDD and DDE. In the absence of reference standards for the metabolites of m,p’-DDD, assignments for their HPLC peaks are on the basis of comparisons of mass spectra and the retention times (tR) of these metabolites to those of the o,p’- and p,p’-DDD series. The assignments deduced for peaks (A-C) and the comparisons to reference data in bold face are as follows:

(A) m,p’-DDA vs p,p’-DDA (tR: 51,52.5 min) m/z (relative intensity) of the methyl esters: 296 (6,5) [M + 2]; 294 (10,8) [M]; 237 (65,64) [M + 2- COOCH3]; 235 (100,100) [M-COOCH3]; 201 (7,6) [M + 2-COOCH3-HCI]; 199 (17,29) [M-COOCH3- HCI]; 165 (43,57) [M-COOCH3-Cl2].

(B) a-OH-m,p’-DDD vs œ-OH-p,p’-DDD (tR: 54,55 min) m/z (relative intensity): 253 (57) [M + 2- CHCI2]; 252 (39) [M + 2-CH2C12]; 251 (89) [M- CHCI2]; 250 (58) [M-CH2Cl2]; 141 (39,32) [M + 2- CH2Cl2-C6H4CI]; 139 (100,100) [M-CH2Cl2-C6H4CI]; 113 (9,13) [M + 2-CH2Cl2-C6H4CI-CO); 111 (27,38) [M-CH2Cl2-C6H4CI-CO].

(C) m,p’-DDE vs p,p’-DDE (tR: 90,86 min) m/z (relative intensity): 320 (40,44) [M + 4]; 318 (76,81) [M + 2]; 316 (65,68) [M]; 281 (11,13) [M-CI]; 248 (70,71) [M + 2-Cl2]; 246 (100,100) [M-Cl2]; 212 (8,6) [M + 2-Cl2-HCI]; 210 (22,16) [M-Cl2-HCI]; 176 (48,34) [M + 2-Cl2-2HCI].

The results for the three DDD isomers examined for their adrenalytic effects using the human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line NCI H-295 are shown in Table 3. The rank order of the effects of the DDD isomers upon cell proliferation and cortisol production was o,p’- > m,p’- > p,p’-DDD.

DISCUSSION

Mitotane metabolism in bovine adrenal subcellular fractions showed the majority of metabolic trans- formations as well as apparent covalent binding to occur in the whole homogenate with localization in the mitochondria (Table 1). These results are in agreement with previous reports citing the mitochondria as the primary source of enzymes for in vitro adrenal transformation of mitotane [5-8]. In addition to o,p’-DDA as the major metabolite, a- OH-DDA, p-OH-DDA and a small amount of o,p’- DDE metabolites were also observed. Although adrenal microsomes contain P450c21 and P45017a two cytochrome P450 isozymes involved in adrenal steroidogenesis, the biotransformation of mitotane in this fraction was negligible. This is in contrast to

p,p'-DDD4±1.85 ± 0.29 ± 0.10 ± 0.03the compoundsvaluefor theblank
16.4 11.4 6.30 9.63period,A520the
theThecorrectedof
ortreatmentmedium
1.39 0.33 0.05andplate.
3± ± ± ±0.02been
thethisthe
m,p'-DDD(µg/dL)+15.8 11.6 6.66 8.45of wells),onhavein
o,p'-DDD,level= 24values
0.24 0.05 0.05 ±0.36beginning Nperformeddetected
All
withCortisol21.00 ± 1.81 ± 1.28 ± 4.52the ± SEM,was(wells).was
At (meancortisol
daysassay
7cells/well.
for0.20 0.10 0.13 0.35dyeNo
treated11.11 ± 0.77 ± 0.87 ± 2.21 ±10,000 (A520) valuesBmeasurementswells).
164
H-295)at=
plates, absorbancesulforhodamineofN
0.012 0.017 0.009 0.008 0.009SEMSEM,
(NCI4± ± ± ± ±96-wellthe±+
cells1.200 1.230 1.100 0.380 0.960timeperiod,mean(mean
into zerothe
cancer
0.021 0.014 0.018 0.010 0.006theis[18]
1-4
3± ± ± + ±dispensedtreatment
adrenal(A520)*1.150 1.040 1.160 0.870 0.379obtainexperimentsdescribed
to
humanwere plate7-day
ofproliferationcellstheinpreviously
0.008 0.012 0.012 0.004 0.009H-295 oneofcontrol
Cell2± ± ± ± ±onendas
production0.544 0.505 0.429 0.197 0.354themedium
cortisoladdition, performedAtuntreatedcells.
0.010 0.008 0.019 0.010 0.002compound wasplate.the without
andof
and
1± ± ± ± ±assay
growth0.238 0.265 0.409 0.353 0.143dyeremainingcompoundwell
Celldays before Bto themeasurements blank cells.
3.eachof
TableTreatment µM)time o,p'-DDD m,p'-DDD p,p'-DDD ControlSeven sulforhodamineaddedforCortisol absorbance without
(50Zero*wereshownt wells

liver microsomal incubations where the microsomal fraction is the major source of enzymes for transformations of o,p’-DDD [7].

The biotransformation of mitotane in whole homogenates was equal to that in the recombined mitochondria and cytosol, while mitochondria alone exhibited only about half of this level of activity (Table 1). A possible explanation for these results is the increase in the availability of mitotane to mitochondrial enzyme systems brought about by the addition of cytosol. Vahouny et al. [19] have reported that sterol carrier protein2 present in cytosol caused the stimulation of cholesterol transport across mitochondrial membranes. This protein is reported to be identical to non-specific lipid transfer protein [20]. In our system, such carriers might serve as carriers of mitotane and enhance its mitochondrial metabolism.

Aliphatic oxidation to the acetic acid derivative, DDA, is the major route of transformation of o,p’- DDD in all the incubations (Table 1). Aromatic hydroxylation, which was accompanied by aliphatic oxidation to yield p-OH-DDA, was a lesser route of metabolism for both o,p’- and m,p’-DDD (Table 2). This is in agreement with previous in vivo [4, 5] and in vitro perfusion studies [10] for mitotane.

The major route for the formation of DDA is postulated to consist of 8-hydroxylation followed by dehydrochlorination to yield an acyl chloride that in the presence of water would result in the formation of DDA (Fig. 1). This mechanism follows a common route of metabolism for the oxidative dehydrohalogenation of dihalogenated methine moieties [21] as has been studied extensively in the case of chloramphenicol [22,23] and has been proposed as the major route of metabolism of p,p’- DDD to p,p’-DDA in vivo [24-26]. Also by analogy to the chloramphenicol studies, acyl chloride formation in the presence of a bionucleophile could result in covalent binding such as that noted for the DDD isomers in the present study (Tables 1 and 2).

o,p’-DDE, a known human metabolite of mitotane [27,28], was also found in trace amounts in the incubations of o,p’-DDD (Table 1). An additional minor metabolite from o,p’-DDD was detected at a 4-min greater retention time than that of the major o,p’-DDA peak. On the basis of the similarity of the retention time to that of the reference a-OH- p,p’-DDD and the corresponding a-OH-m,p’-DDD isolated from our m,p’-DDD incubations, this metabolite is postulated to be a-OH-o,p’-DDD (Table 1).

The total yields of metabolites for the o,p’- and m,p’-isomers were similar, whereas that for the p,p’- isomer was significantly less. Also, there was a definite difference in the distribution of metabolites when the chloro substituent was moved from the ortho position. The resulting decrease in steric hindrance to oxidation at the benzylic «-carbon may account for the increased formation of @-OH-DDD. With this increase in a-OH-DDD for both the m,p’- and p,p’-isomers, there was also an increase in corresponding DDE formation (Table 2). These DDE metabolites could be formed as the dehydration products of their corresponding @-OH-DDD metab- olites. This route would represent a deactivation

Fig. 1. Proposed pathways for the metabolism of DDD isomers through aliphatic oxidation.

CI

OH

H20

CI

C

CI

C

CI

tl

C

C

α[0]

CI

H

CI

CI

Cl

CI

NADPH, O2

CH

CI

a-OH-DDD

DDE

C

CI

CI

B[O]

H

CI

HCI

CI

o,p’., m.p’-, p.p’-DDD

CH

CI

CH

CI

C

11

C

CI

OH

CI

0

CI

+H20

CI

CH

CI

acylation of bionucleophiles

0

C

OH

DDA

pathway that would compete with metabolic activation leading to tissue binding, as proposed in Fig. 1.

An additional metabolite hydroxylated at the a- position of DDA, 2,4’-dichlorobenzylic acid (@-OH- DDA), was only detected for mitotane in the whole adrenocortical homogenates (Table 1). This metabolite has been found previously for in vitro adrenal perfusion studies [10]. While direct hydroxylation at the a-carbon as discussed above could contribute to the formation of @-OH-DDA, a more likely pathway would be through an epoxide intermediate as established for a secondary route of metabolism of p,p’-DDD in vivo [24, 25]. That is, dehydrochlorination of mitotane to 1-(4- chlorophenyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-chloroethyene could occur followed by epoxidation of this unsatu- rated intermediate with subsequent hydrolysis and further oxidation at the ß-carbon. If this dehydro- chlorination pathway does occur with adrenal homogenates, it would be limited in m,p’- and p,p’- DDD metabolism by the increased competing direct a-hydroxylation of these isomers compared with mitotane and by the overall low level of p,p’-DDD metabolism. It is of interest in this connection that hydroylsis studies of the radioactivity bound to adrenal proteins with mitotane metabolism yields efficient recoveries of radioactivity in the form of o,p’-DDA with no «-OH-DDA detected [29]. This is in agreement with the acylation and not an epoxide pathway being the major contributor to protein binding.

In vivo studies, conducted in dogs as we previously described for mitotane [18], indicated that the m,p’- isomer retained adrenalytic activity while the p,p’- isomer did not. Nichols [30] in an earlier in vivo

comparison of the three isomers reported that the order of the adrenalytic effect of the three isomers was m,p’ > o,p’ with the p,p’-isomer having only marginal activity. Nichols proposed that this in vivo order of adrenalytic activity was related to the rela- tive lipid solubility of the three isomers and their relative absorption after administration.

Differences in the availability to adrenal tissue among the o,p’-DDD isomers could be an important variable in their in vivo activity. Therefore, it was of interest to determine their relative activity at the cellular level. Towards this end, the activities of the three isomers were compared in the human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line NCI H-295. As noted in Table 3 for each of four experiments, the rank order for suppression of cell growth and cortisol production for the DDD isomers compared with their controls was o,p’ > m,p’ > p,p’. These results correlate to the extent of DDA formation and binding in incubations with adrenal cortex preparations, as summarized in Table 2. This correlation is consistent with the concept that the extent of ß-hydroxylation, which leads to formation of a reactive intermediate, is an important factor in the adrenalytic activity of these isomers and should be considered in the design of an improved drug for the treatment of adrenocortical carcinoma.

Acknowledgements-This study was supported by the Millie Schembechler Adrenal Cancer Program of The University of Michigan and by Grant R01 CA37794 from the National Cancer Institute, DHHS.

REFERENCES

1. Hutter AM Jr and Kayhoe DR, Adrenal cortical

carcinoma. Results of treatment with o,p’-DDD in 138 patients. Am J Med 41: 581-592, 1966.

2. Temple TE Jr, Jones DJ Jr, Liddle GW and Dexter RN, Treatment of Cushing’s disease: Correction of hypercortisolism by o,p’-DDD without induction of aldosterone deficiency. N Engl J Med 281: 801-805, 1969.

3. Sinsheimer JE, Guilford J, Bobrin LJ and Schteingart DE, Identification of o,p’-dichlorodiphenyl acetic acid as a urinary metabolite of 1-(o-chlorophenyl)-1-(p- chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane. J Pharm Sci 61: 314-316, 1972.

4. Reif VD, Sinsheimer JE, Ward JC and Schteingart DE, Aromatic hydroxylation and alkyl oxidation in metabolism of mitotane (o,p’-DDD) in humans. J Pharm Sci 63: 1730-1736, 1974.

5. Reif VD and Sinsheimer JE, Metabolism of 1-(0- chlorophenyl)-1-(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane (o,p’-DDD) in rats Drug Metab Dispos 3: 15-25, 1975.

6. Martz F and Straw JA, The in vitro metabolism of 1- (o - chlorophenyl) - 1 - (p - chlorophenyl) - 2,2 - dichloroethane (o,p’-DDD) by dog adrenal mito- chondria and metabolite covalent binding to mito- chondrial macromolecules. A possible mechanism for the adrenocorticolytic effect. Drug Metab Dispos 5: 482-486, 1977.

7. Martz F and Straw JA, Metabolism and covalent binding of 1-(o-chlorophenyl)-1-(p-chlorophenyl)- 2,2-dichloroethane (o,p’-DDD). Correlation between adrenocorticolytic activity and metabolic activation by adrenocortical mitochondria. Drug Metab Dispos 8: 127-130, 1980.

8. Pohland RC and Counsell RE, In vitro and in vivo metabolism of a radioiodinated analog of 1-(2- chlorophenyl)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane. Drug Metab Dispos 13: 113-115, 1985.

9. Rief VD, Littleton BC and Sinsheimer JE, In vitro biotransformation of 1 -(o-chlorophenyl) - 1 - (p- chlorophenyl)-2,2-cichloroethane (o,p’-DDD) and 1,1- bis(p-chlorophenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane (p.p’-DDD) by bovine adrenal. J Agric Food Chem 23: 996-999, 1975.

10. Sinsheimer JE and Freeman CJ, Mitotane (1-(o- chlorophenyl)-1-(p-chlorphenyl)-2,2-dichloroethane) metabolism in perfusion studies with dog adrenal glands. Drug Metab Dispos 15: 267-269, 1987.

11. Ribelin WE, Effect of drugs and chemicals upon the structure of the adrenal gland. Fundam Appl Toxicol 4: 105-119, 1984.

12. Colby HD, Adrenal gland Toxicity: Chemically induced dysfunction. J Am Coll Toxicol 7: 45-69, 1988.

13. Inoi T, Gericke P and Horton WJ, 1,1-Dichloro-2-(o- chlorophenyl)-2-(p-chlorophenyl)ethane and related compounds. J Org Chem 27: 4597-4601, 1962.

14. Counsell RE and Willette RE, Synthesis of 14C-labeled isomers of dichlorodiphenyldichlorethanes (DDD). J Pharm Sci 55: 1012 — 1015, 1966.

15. Miller GL, Protein determination for large numbers of samples. Anal Chem 31: 964, 1959.

16. Fales HM, Jaouni TM and Babashak JF, Simple device for preparing ethereal diazomethane without resorting to codistillation. Anal Chem 45: 2302-2303, 1973.

17. Gazdar AF, Oie HK, Shackleton CH, Chen TR, Tricke TJ, Myers CE, Chrousos GP, Brennan MF, Stein CA and LaRocca RV, Establishment and characterization of a human adrenocortical carcinoma cell line that expresses multiple pathways of steroid biosynthesis. Cancer Res 50: 5488-5496, 1990.

18. Schteingart DE, Sinsheimer JE, Counsell RE, Abrams GD, McClellan N, Djanegara T, Hines J, Ruangwises N, Benitez R and Wotring L, Comparison of the adrenalytic activity of mitotane and a methylated homolog on normal adrenal cortex and adrenal cortical carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 31: 459-466, 1993.

19. Vahouny GV, Chanderbhan R, Noland BJ, Irwin D, Dennis P, Lambeth JD and Scallen TJ, Sterol carrier protein2: Identification of adrenal sterol carrier protein2 and site of action for mitochondrial cholesterol utilization. J Biol Chem 258: 11731-11737, 1983.

20. Wirtz KWA and Gardella TWJ Jr, Properties and modes of action of specific and non-specific phospholipid transfer proteins. Experientia 46: 592-599, 1990.

21. Anders MW and Pohl LR, Halogenated alkanes. In: Bioactivation of Foreign Compounds (Ed. Anders MW), pp. 283-315. Academic Press, New York, 1985.

22. Pohl LR, Nelson SD and Krishna G, Investigation of the mechanism of the metabolic activation of chloramphenicol by rat liver microsomes. Biochem Pharmacol 27: 491-496, 1978.

23. Halpert J, Covalent modification of lysine during the suicide inactivation of rat liver cytochrome P-450 by chloramphenicol. Biochem Pharmacol 30: 875-881, 1981.

24. Gold B and Brunk B, Metabolism of 1,1,1-trichloro- 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane and 1,1-dichloro-2,2- bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane in the mouse. Chem Biol Interact 41: 327-339, 1982.

25. Gold B and Brunk G, Metabolism of 1,1,1-trichloro- 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)ethane (DDT), 1,1-dichloro- 2,2-bis-(p-chlorophenyl)ethane and 1-chloro-2,2-bis(p- chlorophenyl)ethane in the hamster. Cancer Res 43: 2644-2647, 1983.

26. Gold B and Brunk G, A mechanistic study of the metabolism of 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis(p-chloro- phenyl)cthane (DDD) to 2,2-bis(p-chlorophenyl)acetic acid (DDA). Biochem Pharmacol 33: 979-982, 1984.

27. Benecke R, Vetter B and De Zeeuw RA, Rapid micromethod for the analysis of mitotane and its metabolite in plasma by gas-chromatography with electron-capture detection. J Chromatogr 417: 287- 294, 1987.

28. Inouye M, Mio T and Sumino K, Use of GC/MS/SIM for rapid determination of plasma levels of o,p’-DDD, o,p’-DDE and o,p’-DDA. Clin Chim Acta 170: 305- 314, 1987.

29. Cai W, Counsell RE, Djanegara T, Schteingart DE, Sinsheimer JE and Wotring LL, The metabolic activation and binding of mitotane in adrenal cortex homogenates. J Pharm Sci, 84: 134-138, 1995.

30. Nichols J, Studies on an adrenal cortical inhibitor. In: The Adrenal Cortex (Ed. Moon HD), pp. 84-107. Paul B. Hoeber, New York, 1961.